Do you think smoking kills? What about the negative impact of smartphones? Or are we unknowingly controlled by technology? Over the past decade, technological development has exploded in the field of telecommunications, particularly in the area of ​​mobile technology. Although smartphones have changed our lifestyle by bringing convenience and some positive changes, their negative impact has also affected students' academic performance, social interactions, and self-regulation. In fact, the negative impact of smartphones outweighs its positive impact on a student's life. First, the negative influence of smartphones is evident on the quality of students' education. This is especially true when it comes to language and grammar accuracy. However, opponents of this claim claim that it is the use of innovative language for smartphone applications that helps improve students' writing skills and spelling accuracy. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay To some extent, they are not wrong. The argument they put forward is that the benefits of some smartphone applications, such as Puzzles, Crosswords and some correct pronunciation applications, have actually helped students with their pronunciation and enriched their vocabulary. On the other hand, using abbreviations in (SMS) or texting via smartphones had a serious influence on students' grammar and spelling efficiency (Kate Ross, 2010). Moreover, frequent use of smartphones has also distracted students' attention in class. Many of them can't put their cell phones down. A study by (International Review and Research on Education, 2013) shows that 14% of students, at one time or another, play games on their mobile during classes. However, some studies conclude that playing smartphone games actually strengthens a student's critical thinking. Even if this is true, the focus of our discussion is not whether the use of smartphones improves a student's critical thinking, but whether the use of smartphones distracts the student from their learning and thus affects his academic results. Second, a smartphone can literally affect a student's social interactions. “Several researchers have identified social influence as a key concept that influences both usage intention and usage behavior, and therefore plays an important role in consumer adoption of new technologies.” (Kulviwat, BrunerII and Al-Shuridah, 2009; S. Lee, 2013; Ting, Lim, Patanmacia, Low and Ker, 2011; Imtiaz, Arif and Wajeeha, Aslam, 2014). As a result, smartphone users are becoming independent, especially in the case of students for whom they no longer want physical company. They spend most of their time on social media like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. They make friends and form relationships, but in a virtual world. As a result, students may also lose interest in interacting with their instructors. They prefer to communicate via a chat app, send messages or simply express what they like or dislike by ticking. Additionally, smartphones come with Internet access capability, which complicates things. For example, when students are faced with difficult questions, they no longer ask teachers; instead, they easily do a quick Google search to find answers. However, these answers, taken from cyberspace,may not be the right answer to their questions. In this way, the smartphone not only affects a student socially but also mentally. Mentally, they become weak because they don't need to use their brains as often to find and solve difficult questions. They turn to Google for everything they want to know. Eventually, from a social perspective, students will become more and more self-centered and shy as they begin to lose motivation for physical communication. The scary thing is that they might end up preferring solitude over community. Finally, smartphones are beginning to destroy our students’ self-regulatory abilities. According to the MPRA research report published by Imtiaz Arif and Wajeeha Aslam in 2014, before the launch of 3G and 4G spectrum in Pakistan in April, the smartphone market accounted for only 15% of the mobile industry. After the availability of these new mobile networks through three major network operators in the country, the demand for smartphones has exploded rapidly and is expected that within a year, it will reach a whopping 50%. It is perhaps this positive outlook that prompted United Mobile, which was one of the leading distributors of Nokia phones in the country, to launch its own smartphone recently. Optimism among mobile phone makers ahead of spectrum sanctions has also been reflected in the country's telecommunications imports. . Mobile phone imports for the month of February 2014 increased by 20% to Rs 6 billion, compared to Rs 5 billion in February 2013. Opponents may argue that the acceptance of smartphones in their lives has brought them benefits. huge benefits. For example, they can communicate with their friends via the Internet easily, cheaply and without any restrictions. But a survey carried out by (CHI, 2007) says the opposite. Interviews were conducted with students at a Korean university based on their dependence on their smartphones. The result was totally negative. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay An average student's response was that even when they wanted to stop using their smartphone, they were not able to do so. They would continue to use them unintentionally. This shows that they have somehow lost their self-control and power of self-regulation. Instead of taking control of the device, the smartphone in turn took control of its master. It's as if we are not only dependent on our smartphones, but completely addicted to using it. We are no longer our own masters. Einstein once said: “Imagination is more important than knowledge.” Knowledge is limited. Imagination goes around the world. Technology has encircled our imagination and knowledge. Today we are slaves to our own hand-made devices. Instead of being ourselves, we trust technology more than our own species. Works Cited Ross, K. (2010). The impact of SMS on students' grammatical and spelling skills. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 142-149. International Journal and Research in Education. (2013). The influence of smartphone use on students' attention in class. International Journal and Research on Education, 1(1), 24-31. Kulviwat, S., Bruner II, G.C., and Al-Shuridah, O. (2009). Toward a unified theory of consumer acceptance technology: Implications for consumer adoption of technological innovation. Psychology and Marketing, 26(8), 661-680.Lee, S. (2013). An investigation into the factors that influence adoption, 36, 18-29.