To begin generating solutions, I would first follow the advice recommended by Gatewood, Field, and Barrick (2011) in that I would first perform a job analysis on the positions I am trying to fill. recruit for. To conduct this job analysis, I would gather data on the KSAs needed for the position by conducting in-person interviews with SMEs in an individual or group setting, using a structured interview to obtain clear results. The job analysis will give me information on relevant dimensions of job performance and identification of the KSAs needed for the job. However, the job analysis must be conducted fully from a legal and defensible point of view. Gatewood, Field, and Barrick (2011) recommend a variety of ways to accomplish this, from using a professional job analyst to ensuring that KSAs are mentioned most frequently as the type of information to identify during analysis. From there, I will then be able to formulate a complete and adapted job description which gives candidates a realistic overview of the position and also allows me to develop relevant selection systems. My next step would be to review previous recruitment strategies used by On-Demand Transport to assess their effectiveness and areas for improvement. By using historical data, I will also be able to show improved effectiveness of my recruiting solutions. To demonstrate the effectiveness of my recruitment plan, I would use the advice of Gatewood, Field, and Barrick (2011). They recommended a range of recruitment measures to get a more complete picture of recruitment effectiveness. I would first look to evaluate past recruiting strategies so that I can compare the newly implemented recruiting plan to past strategies used by On D...... middle of document ......ning and evaluations d experience for selection procedures. As Gatewood, Field, and Barrick (2011) mentioned in their section on travel and travel cost assessments, travel and travel assessments are useful in making quick initial selection decisions, particularly when there are a large number of applications to sort through. With on-demand transportation, their goal is to increase the efficiency of their selection procedures and, although the travel and expense assessments were found to be very reliable (>0.80), the validity measures showed a modest coefficient. The main disadvantage of this measure is that it is also time-consuming, the requester requires analytical and writing skills, and there are accuracy issues, especially if the timeliness of the answers is obvious to the requester. Overall, I think the cost-benefit ratio is too high and would not provide the best value for on-demand transportation..