Similarly, they are used to predict, understand, and influence how an individual can undertake the changes necessary to preempt a health crisis (Glanz et al. , 2015). Additionally, both models aim to focus on attitudes toward self-efficacy in order to consider the belief stages necessary to take the steps needed to transform bad habits into good habits (Glanz et al., 2015). On the other hand, the difference between HBM and TTM lies in the way in which they are used, which affects behavioral changes, being a categorical intervention aimed at applying a certain discretion (Glanz et al., 2015). For example, the HBM difference focuses on perceived thoughts that progress toward cognitive awareness (Glanz et al., 2015). In the ability to consider how the process regarding an individual's health may change based on the knowledge acquired (Glanz et al., 2015). Additionally, action had to take into account disease consideration and perceived action to resist illness in terms of susceptibility, severity, benefit, and barriers to activating action signals in the threat of disease reduction (Glanz et al..,