This assignment will focus on the children's storyline "Little Red Riding Hood" as the data source for analysis. The assignment will review the function of contempt (as described by Grice's cooperative principle) in the tale and examine whether this function is prevalent and encourages readers to imagine the tale. The hypothesis approach (blundering is a literary device commonly used in such texts) will be carried out by analyzing primary and secondary references, journal articles and tutor's notes while making reference to the scenario "Little Riding Hood Red ". plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Grice's cooperative principle theory is the main linguistic approach considered when analyzing this script. This theory focuses on how the reader or listener can decode a sentence in order to understand what is implied versus what was said. For understanding to be established between the speaker and the listener, each maxim must be satisfied in a single sentence. The four maxims stated by Grice are quality, quantity, relationship and manner. In some cases, the speaker intentionally violates one of the maxims because he wants the listener to notice something, this is called contempt. The storyline and content have a traditional value that children have been reading for many years. The myth of “Little Red Riding Hood” was born in various European countries. This tale focuses on the culture of the original era with the intention of teaching lessons through the story told. It could be argued that Little Red Riding Hood was naive and did not realize that the wolf was mean, greedy and dangerous to her. The cooperative principle of Grice's maxims does not always apply. Little Red Riding Hood is an example of disregard or violation of maxims. The main purpose of disregarding the maxims of the story is to teach a lesson about moral values, protect oneself from outsiders, and entertain the reader/listener. Grice's cooperative principle focuses on what the reader/learner gains from what is said or written in comparison. to what is implied, the pragmatics of dialogue. Pragmatics is fundamentally based on awareness of the use of language as a form of communication. For example in Little Red Riding Hood where the wolf gives simplistic responses to the alterations of the one called "grandmother", ignoring the maxim of quantity. When Little Red Riding Hood comments on her grandmother's "big ears", the wolf responds: "It's to hear you better!" ". The wolf deliberately flouts the maxim of quantity and hides all information from Little Red Riding Hood. He does this in order to create suspense and make Little Red Riding Hood ask more questions, as a wolf would when antagonizing its prey. Yule (2010) asserted that the use of pragmatics includes conversational structure, speech acts, and a hypothesis about what the story is about. The violation of the maxim of quality in the story is that there is less information than required, meaning the reader does not get a detailed understanding or description. The Brothers Grimm's version of Little Red Riding Hood does not take into account the reader's basic knowledge (in defiance of the maxim of relevance). As a result, the reader can anticipate and guess the ending of the tale. The reader's anticipation once again reinforces the moral behind the story of Little Red Riding Hood. If the reader fails to anticipate the correct ending, the moral allegory of not judging someone upon first meeting is still.