The theoretical question that has been posed in this article is whether private prosocial self-schemas and self-awareness private prosocial are predictors. of prosocial behavior. Self-schema is thought to play an important role in regulating behavior. Behavior is thought to be influenced by the activation of a schema. This pattern is linked to self-perception. There is little evidence to conclude that self-schemas independently influence any type of behavior, and it is assumed that self-descriptive information and behavioral information are stored independently of each other. This would suggest that the links between self-schema and behaviors are not completely defined. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay To influence behavior, private personal attention is essential. One must be self-aware to adhere to private self-awareness. This private self-awareness seems to have a lower limit of about nine years. The question posed is whether there are specific links between the prosocial self and the prediction of prosocial behavior and, if so, what these links are. In the first third study, the subjects were over nine years old. The reason is that children start to label themselves differently. At this age, children begin to label themselves with more traits and not behavioral self-descriptions. There were thirty-eight participants from fifth to seventh grade. There were nineteen of each sex. The study examined both self-schemas and schema-type control measures. The two self-schemas were private self-attention and private self-awareness. The two schematic control measures were communion and agency words with different probe questions. Some questions were like: “Does this word sound like you?” or “Is that a nice word?” » The procedure carried out during the first experiment was simple. Participants were brought into a testing room by one of two experimenters. The experimenters were both women. The participant would then be informed that they would be participating in a series of different games, puzzles and quizzes. The children were told that in exchange for their participation, they would receive fifteen tokens worth ten cents each. Tokens could be redeemed for a gift certificate to Baskin Robbins. The children were then told that they could give some of their tokens to children who were not participating in the study, but that they did not have to do so if they did not want to. To manipulate private self-awareness, the experimenter used an abbreviated version of the California Q-sort for children. The California Q-sort got children to focus on their true selves, then back to their ideal selves. Children who were not in this state thought along the lines of “Name as many cars as possible.” The experimenter informed the participants that she had to leave for a minute. The experimenter then gave the children the option to give some of their tokens privately to those who don't have any, but you don't have to do this if you don't want to. This was done for the private self-awareness task. For the private self-schema task, participants were then given a task designed to measure the extent to which they had articulated a private self-schema in each of the two domains. The two domains are the words of.