Table of ContentsIntroductionBody ParagraphConclusionIntroductionAssisted suicide, the practice of helping a person voluntarily bring about their own death, has long been a controversial issue, raising profound ethical, moral questions and legal. The debate on assisted suicide is not only a contemporary concern but touches on fundamental principles of human dignity, autonomy and the role of health professionals. This essay aims to explore the ethical dimensions of assisted suicide, examining the arguments for and against the practice. By delving deeper into the complexities of this sensitive issue, we seek to understand whether assisted suicide can be ethically justified and under what circumstances, if any, it should be permitted.Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayBody ParagraphThe main argument for assisted suicide is based on the principle of autonomy. Supporters argue that individuals have the right to make decisions about their own bodies, including the decision to end their lives. This perspective emphasizes the importance of personal choice and the belief that competent individuals should have the power to determine the course of their own lives, free from undue interference. In cases of terminal illness, where patients may experience unbearable pain and suffering, the option of assisted suicide can be seen as an exercise in compassion, offering a way to relieve suffering and die with dignity. From a utilitarian perspective, the ethical justification for assisting suicide may arise from the principle of minimizing harm and maximizing well-being. If a terminally ill patient is suffering from severe pain and has no prospect of recovery, assisted suicide may be considered as a way to reduce their suffering. In this context, helping a person to end their life could be considered ethically permissible if it results in a net reduction in suffering. Additionally, allowing assisted suicide could potentially ease the emotional and financial burden on families and healthcare systems, redirecting resources to patients who have a chance of recovery. Despite these arguments, opponents of assisted suicide raise important ethical concerns. One of the main objections is rooted in the principle of the sanctity of life, which posits that life has intrinsic value and must be preserved. Critics argue that approval of assisted suicide undermines this principle and could lead to a slippery slope, where the value of human life is diminished and vulnerable people, such as those with disabilities or mental illness , may feel forced to choose death over life. Additionally, there are concerns about potential abuse and coercion, in which individuals may be influenced by external factors, such as family pressure or societal expectations, to opt for assisted suicide against their true wishes. The role of medical professionals in assisted suicide also presents an ethical dilemma. The Hippocratic Oath, adhered to by many healthcare professionals, emphasizes the duty to do no harm. Assisted suicide, by its nature, involves actively participating in ending a life, which may be considered contradictory to this oath. Physicians and other health care providers may face moral distress when asked to assist in suicide because it calls into question.