blog




  • Essay / Group dynamics: criteria for describing a group

    BERNAMA: case studyIn general, a group can be defined as a larger number of individuals connected to each other through social relationships (Forsyth, 2006). It should be noted that most organizations are made up of several people who work together in particular situations and times (Gordon, 2001). There are four criteria to describe a group; i) the members of the group must perceive themselves as a unit; ii) rewards must be provided by the group to its members; iii) if something happens to one member of the group, the other members should feel the effects; and iv) they must share a common goal. Therefore, it could create group dynamics in a group. Group dynamics involves the study and analysis of how people interact and communicate with each other in small groups face-to-face and can provide a vehicle for analyzing group communications with the goal of making the group more effective ( Davis and Newstrom, 1985). On the other hand, Cartwright and Zender (1968) define group dynamics as "a field of research dedicated to the advancement of knowledge about the nature of groups, the laws of their development, and their interrelationships with individuals, other groups and larger institutions” (p. 19). This could imply that group dynamics could have utilized their current skills such as expertise, laws, and their social relationships with other people in the group and institutions at a macro level. Apart from this, Greenlee and Karanxha (2010) stated that group dynamics can be described as how the group functions effectively and advances knowledge in all situations. Each of the organizations includes a variety of people who work in certain departments. Their interrelationships with them could lead to group dynamics. T...... middle of document ......od leader will strengthen their motivation to fight against the Quraish.ReferencesForsyth, D. (2006). Group dynamics. United States of America: Thomson Learning Gordon, JR (2001). Organizational behavior: A diagnostic approach (7th ed.). Englewood Clifts, NJ: Prentice Hall. Davis, K. and Newstrom, J. W. (1989). Human behavior at work, organizational behavior (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill International Editions. Cartwright, D. & Zander, A. (Eds). (1968). Group dynamics: research and theory (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row. Greenlee, B.J. and Karanxha, Z. (2010). A study of group dynamics in educational leadership cohorts and non-cohort groups. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 5, 11, 357-379Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.