When we imagine getting into college in the United States, it often feels like a race to fill a limited number of seats. SAT, i.e. school assessment test scores, being class president or playing an instrument means plus points for entry. I generally agree that these factors are a good way to decide who should get a seat, but there is one factor that Americans disagree on: race. Should race continue to play a role in how universities choose their students? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay As a tool to increase diversity, affirmative action has been successful. There are two simple reasons for this: One of the reasons we persist in talking about affirmative action is that many of us don't actually know what it is. It was originally a way for colleges and universities to give special attention to racial minorities to help undo the effects of past discrimination. For many schools, this meant reserving a certain percentage of their seats for minority applicants. University administrators can no longer use affirmative action to combat past discrimination, but they can use it to create a diverse student body, and to be fair, diversity is good for everyone. This is not a racial bonus or quota, nor is it historical discrimination. This is a very narrow and frankly confusing tool for colleges to create more racial diversity. Affirmative action programs often fall into two basic categories and the first is our arguments dealing with historical compensation. Since many African Americans today are descended from Africans brought to America in chains and then forced into servitude. The idea of ​​this argument is that affirmative action programs help compensate this group of people who have been historically wronged. Most arguments, however, fall into the category of current and future lack of fairness in the society in which we live. For example, many people are denied positions in business and education due to active and sometimes unconscious discrimination or due to poverty and educational gaps. There are of course also a number of arguments against affirmative action. Probably the most common argument is that affirmative action programs constitute a form of discrimination. In this case, reverse discrimination. Discrimination against people based on race and gender this time mainly affects white people and men. The real question arises as to whether affirmative action programs are constitutional. Another concern with affirmative action programs is that they perpetuate racial and gender consciousness. A primary goal of affirmative action programs is that hiring and promotion decisions be made on the basis of the candidate's worth, not on the basis of racial or gender consciousness. Yet affirmative action programs perpetuate this very situation, in which race and gender are affected at all levels or are considered at all levels in the hiring and promotion processes of companies and establishments. 'education. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper now from our editors..