Photoshopping Images and Its Impact on Eating Disorders ) on Statista there were eleven thousand people aged eighteen. at twenty-five years old who have been diagnosed with anorexia nervosa. Four thousand more people in the same age group have been diagnosed with bulimia nervosa. What's interesting is that in the United States, twenty-six thousand people have been diagnosed with one or more eating disorders. What is the cause of these disorders? Some blamed magazines and Photoshop, as seen in the Daily Telegraph's 2012 headline: "My Anorexia Was Fueled by Celebrity Magazines: Victim Demands Ban on Airbrush Photographs." » Is Photoshopping Images Really Causing All These Eating Disorder Statistics? Photoshop is not to blame due to other factors, such as genetics, temperament, trauma, etc. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay There are many articles on eating disorders that point out that Photoshop is responsible for the increase in eating disorders. According to the Huffington Post Magazine in the article titled “Is Photoshop Destroying America’s Body Image?” Author Vivian Diller, PH.D., noted that Kate Winslet and Brad Pitt announced that Photoshop was destroying the image of the American body. Diller also writes: “While most people dream of magically removing pounds and wrinkles… more and more people view Photoshop as dangerous territory. " For what? Because many women claim that it is the media, such as commercials, weight loss ads, magazines, reality TV shows or even billboards, that leads them to conclude that they are not more satisfied with their body or have very low self-esteem. . Women feel like they have to live up to these standards because it’s the “new” beauty. (Diller) Just because women “claim” that the media and Photoshop give them “low self-esteem,” does that mean it’s true? Eating disorder specialist Carrie Arnold did her own research and came to the conclusion that distorted images of celebrities are not the main cause of eating disorders. The article “Edited Photographs in Fashion Magazines Contribute to Unrealistic Body Images” asked Carrie Arnold about her thoughts on Photoshop. His response was, “Show me the evidence.” What does Photoshop have to do with this? Studies by the AMA do not link Photoshop to diagnosable eating disorders, as specified in the DSM-IV. 1.,” Arnold said. The DSM-IV stands for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. It is used to categorize psychiatric diagnoses such as anorexia, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, etc. (“Diagnosis and statistics…”). Arnold compared the Photoshop/eating disorder claim to the misconception that sanitizer ads somehow promote OCD. “Edited Photographs in Fashion Magazines Contribute to Unrealistic Body Images” says condemning Photoshop will have little impact on America's view of beauty. Beauty has grown in recent years and continues to change. Getting rid of Photoshop won't do much to change the way women perceive their bodies. However,some steps have been taken to remove Photoshop from billboards, magazines and photographs. What was put forward was the idea of finding something that would end the blame on Photoshop. The researchers' idea is to use warning labels. Warning labels have been shown to decrease the appeal of a product because, in most cases, warning labels are used to avoid what is on the warning labels. (Contraacting Media's Thin-Body…) An example of this might be a bottle of Tylenol that warns the customer that the pills contain acetaminophen and can cause liver damage if too many pills are taken. The reaction of people who no longer want something after reading a warning label is called reactance theory. Reactance theory occurs when a person feels the need to restore their freedom because they feel restricted after reading the warning label. With this theory, people might just ignore the warning label. So there would be no point in having a warning label. People would feel limited and rebel against this label. In the case of warning labels on photos, customers would try to look even more like the models than before the images without warning labels. This problem is more likely in adolescents because they are in the developmental phase of their lives. So warning labels may not work at all but make the problem worse. (Contraacting Media's Thin-Body…) Another idea was brought up along with the idea of warning labels. Informational labels might be more effective for the adolescent group than warning labels. An example of this would be what nutrition labels look like. Nutrition labels are easy to read, where you can see them, and to the point. This would mean that an information label on a photo would contain information about the model and where the body was photoshopped. According to Bushman in the article “Counteracting Media's Thin-Body…”, an informative label would be more effective than a warning label because it would not provoke the reactance theory as explained previously. (Contraacting Media's Thin-Body…) Even if people come up with ideas to end the blame on Photoshop, there is no reason to do so because Photoshop is not one of the leading causes of brain disorders. food. As previously stated, a diagnosable eating disorder is not something that appears suddenly and disappears in less than two weeks. (“What causes a…”) A diagnosable eating disorder is someone who meets the criteria for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or an eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). Although a person can still have body issues without meeting the DSM-IV criteria. (“Eating Disorder Diagnoses…”) There are many reasons why a woman feels insecure about her body. One of the main causes of eating disorders is genetics. Genetics may play a significant role in increasing the risk of an eating disorder. Research has shown that people have a 90 to 85 percent chance of developing an eating disorder if mutations are detected in the two different genes ESRRA and HDAC4. (“Researchers find genes…”) If a previous family member suffered from an eating disorder, it is more likely that the person with the same genetics will develop an eating disorder. This means..

Essay / Photoshopping Images and Its Impact on Eating Disorders ) on Statista there were eleven thousand people aged eighteen. at twenty-five years old who have been diagnosed with anorexia nervosa. Four thousand more people in the same age group have been diagnosed with bulimia nervosa. What's interesting is that in the United States, twenty-six thousand people have been diagnosed with one or more eating disorders. What is the cause of these disorders? Some blamed magazines and Photoshop, as seen in the Daily Telegraph's 2012 headline: "My Anorexia Was Fueled by Celebrity Magazines: Victim Demands Ban on Airbrush Photographs." » Is Photoshopping Images Really Causing All These Eating Disorder Statistics? Photoshop is not to blame due to other factors, such as genetics, temperament, trauma, etc. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay There are many articles on eating disorders that point out that Photoshop is responsible for the increase in eating disorders. According to the Huffington Post Magazine in the article titled “Is Photoshop Destroying America’s Body Image?” Author Vivian Diller, PH.D., noted that Kate Winslet and Brad Pitt announced that Photoshop was destroying the image of the American body. Diller also writes: “While most people dream of magically removing pounds and wrinkles… more and more people view Photoshop as dangerous territory. " For what? Because many women claim that it is the media, such as commercials, weight loss ads, magazines, reality TV shows or even billboards, that leads them to conclude that they are not more satisfied with their body or have very low self-esteem. . Women feel like they have to live up to these standards because it’s the “new” beauty. (Diller) Just because women “claim” that the media and Photoshop give them “low self-esteem,” does that mean it’s true? Eating disorder specialist Carrie Arnold did her own research and came to the conclusion that distorted images of celebrities are not the main cause of eating disorders. The article “Edited Photographs in Fashion Magazines Contribute to Unrealistic Body Images” asked Carrie Arnold about her thoughts on Photoshop. His response was, “Show me the evidence.” What does Photoshop have to do with this? Studies by the AMA do not link Photoshop to diagnosable eating disorders, as specified in the DSM-IV. 1.,” Arnold said. The DSM-IV stands for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. It is used to categorize psychiatric diagnoses such as anorexia, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, etc. (“Diagnosis and statistics…”). Arnold compared the Photoshop/eating disorder claim to the misconception that sanitizer ads somehow promote OCD. “Edited Photographs in Fashion Magazines Contribute to Unrealistic Body Images” says condemning Photoshop will have little impact on America's view of beauty. Beauty has grown in recent years and continues to change. Getting rid of Photoshop won't do much to change the way women perceive their bodies. However,some steps have been taken to remove Photoshop from billboards, magazines and photographs. What was put forward was the idea of finding something that would end the blame on Photoshop. The researchers' idea is to use warning labels. Warning labels have been shown to decrease the appeal of a product because, in most cases, warning labels are used to avoid what is on the warning labels. (Contraacting Media's Thin-Body…) An example of this might be a bottle of Tylenol that warns the customer that the pills contain acetaminophen and can cause liver damage if too many pills are taken. The reaction of people who no longer want something after reading a warning label is called reactance theory. Reactance theory occurs when a person feels the need to restore their freedom because they feel restricted after reading the warning label. With this theory, people might just ignore the warning label. So there would be no point in having a warning label. People would feel limited and rebel against this label. In the case of warning labels on photos, customers would try to look even more like the models than before the images without warning labels. This problem is more likely in adolescents because they are in the developmental phase of their lives. So warning labels may not work at all but make the problem worse. (Contraacting Media's Thin-Body…) Another idea was brought up along with the idea of warning labels. Informational labels might be more effective for the adolescent group than warning labels. An example of this would be what nutrition labels look like. Nutrition labels are easy to read, where you can see them, and to the point. This would mean that an information label on a photo would contain information about the model and where the body was photoshopped. According to Bushman in the article “Counteracting Media's Thin-Body…”, an informative label would be more effective than a warning label because it would not provoke the reactance theory as explained previously. (Contraacting Media's Thin-Body…) Even if people come up with ideas to end the blame on Photoshop, there is no reason to do so because Photoshop is not one of the leading causes of brain disorders. food. As previously stated, a diagnosable eating disorder is not something that appears suddenly and disappears in less than two weeks. (“What causes a…”) A diagnosable eating disorder is someone who meets the criteria for anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or an eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). Although a person can still have body issues without meeting the DSM-IV criteria. (“Eating Disorder Diagnoses…”) There are many reasons why a woman feels insecure about her body. One of the main causes of eating disorders is genetics. Genetics may play a significant role in increasing the risk of an eating disorder. Research has shown that people have a 90 to 85 percent chance of developing an eating disorder if mutations are detected in the two different genes ESRRA and HDAC4. (“Researchers find genes…”) If a previous family member suffered from an eating disorder, it is more likely that the person with the same genetics will develop an eating disorder. This means..

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch