Gun debates have once again surfaced across the country, following a deadly school shooting resulting in death of seventeen students and teachers. America experienced 18 school shootings in just the first 45 days of 2018. In comparison, Canada has only experienced 19 school shootings in a lifetime of over 328 years. In the United States, gun control has been the subject of national debate for years, usually in the wake of some horrific tragedy. There have been countless movements and protests by the public for new gun control laws to prevent another mass shooting. However, the federal government still fails to do anything about gun control. The National Rifle Association, or NRA, is partly to blame because of its immense efforts to lobby Congress and state legislatures to oppose more gun control laws. Innocent lives have been taken by deranged individuals armed with deadly weapons. Parents have lost their children. The children have lost their parents. Gun control laws must be passed, thoughts and prayers cannot bring back those who have lost their lives, nor save the lives of potential future victims of gun violence. The 2nd Amendment, which protects the right of American citizens to bear arms, was adopted over two hundred years ago in 1791. Since then, firearms have become even more powerful and deadly. The citizens of the United States must demand gun reform and vote against any corrupt NRA-funded politician who refuses to listen to the public's demands and be voted out of office in the next election. Gun reform should not repeal the 2nd Amendment, but serious changes must be made to protect innocent lives. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay Some Politicians Say Mental Health Was the Problem in Every Mass Shooting Case and No Gun Control Legislation could not have prevented a mass shooting tragedy. In 1996, Australia passed strict gun control laws following a mass shooting that left 35 people dead and 18 others injured. Since gun control laws were passed, Australia has not seen a single mass shooting in more than 20 years. The Australian example shows that gun control prevents mass shootings. Unlike America, it only took the Australian government one mass shooting to raise the alarm. A buyback program was established and citizens voluntarily gave up ownership of certain deadly firearms and received compensation. America needs to pass some sort of gun control regulation to prevent another mass shooting from happening again, and the American people overwhelmingly agree that more can be done to prevent mass shootings mass. Deranged individuals should not own guns, background checks should be mandatory. The gun show loophole, which allows people to legally buy a gun without a background check, is still legal in many states. According to the Washington Post, at least 167 of the mass shooters' weapons were obtained legally and 49 were obtained illegally. Public opinion has shifted in favor of legislation on the control ofguns following the deadly shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School on February 14, 2018, the highest level of support for gun control in 20 years. Even though seven in ten people support gun control legislation, the federal government can't get anything passed. Some states have taken the initiative to pass laws, but until the federal government takes action, mass shootings will continue to occur in the United States. According to the Brady campaign, more than 100,000 people in the United States are killed in murders, assaults, suicides, accidents or following police intervention. The companies cut ties with the National Rifle Association following several survivors of the Stoneman Douglas school shooting calling for a boycott of companies offering NRA members discounts on various services. After companies severed ties with the NRA, some major gun suppliers like Walmart, Dick's Sporting Goods and Kroger have also taken steps to protect the public, including removing certain gun products. fire their stores and website. Opponents of gun control advocates argue that gun control would only prevent law-abiding citizens from obtaining access to weapons. The “good guy with gun versus bad guy with gun” argument is often used by those who oppose gun control laws. However, several armed police officers on duty at Stoneman Douglas High School never entered the school while a shooter was active. Instead, deputies stood idly outside the school, later saying they believed the school's active shooter was outside the building. A good guy with a gun couldn't take on a bad guy with a gun. Of all the mass shootings America has seen, how many were stopped by an ordinary citizen with a gun? Even if it does happen, it's incredibly rare. It is usually not ordinary civilians who arrest these deranged individuals, but certified firearms first responders. In these types of situations, the good guy with a gun can easily be mistaken for a bad guy with a gun during an active shooter. Police can open fire on a “nice” armed civilian during a mass shooting. The National Rifle Association is causing mass hysteria that any gun control legislation is in violation of their Second Amendment rights and the government is trying to take guns away from everyone. In the case of District of Columbia v. Heller, a Supreme Court decision clearly established that while citizens have the right to bear arms, the government also has the right to pass laws to protect its citizens. The government can't take guns away from everyone, and most gun control advocates don't want to either. Gun control advocates simply want the least disturbed people to own weapons capable of mass extermination. A majority of gun control supporters want stronger background checks and a ban on military-grade weapons. Many simply want their children to go to school without fearing for their lives. Recently, a solution has been proposed by some politicians to combat mass shootings. “Red flag” laws would disarm at-risk individuals suspected of wrongdoing. Red Flag laws would keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill and criminals. Several..