“Immigrants everywhere have enriched and strengthened the fabric of American life” (Kennedy). In what ways and how have immigrants improved American life? Exactly whose life is being improved by the arrival of immigrants? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Opponents say sanctuary cities prioritize illegal immigrants over public safety. It is the responsibility of local governments, through local law enforcement, to assist immigration officials in deporting potentially dangerous criminals. The U.S. government – ​​not the states – has the power to set immigration policy, and it should defund cities that attempt to obstruct immigration enforcement. On the other hand, many argue that local governments have a responsibility to protect immigrants by making cities sanctuaries. Requiring local law enforcement to serve as immigration agents erodes trust between police and immigrant communities. The U.S. government cannot commandeer local resources to pursue its extreme anti-immigration agenda. Everyone can agree that the United States has generally been welcoming to immigrants seeking asylum or simply settling here for a better life. But this same welcoming story is tinged with periodic hostility. A look at U.S. history shows failures of kindness toward “outsiders.” The first immigrants to colonial America, from northwest Europe, came in search of economic freedom and political freedom. Likewise, today's immigrants also come for economic freedom and political freedom. As the debate over illegal immigration continues to rage, it is important to keep in mind that everyone in the United States is ultimately descended from an "immigrant," even Native Americans whose ancestors are arrived here thousands of years ago, but the rules governing immigration are changing. constantly and often arbitrarily. The first permanent European settlement in the future United States was established by Spain in 1565 in what is now Florida, followed in 1598 by Spanish settlements in territory that eventually became parts of Texas and New Mexico. English colonists established their first permanent colony in 1607 at Jamestown, Virginia, which was also the destination of the first African slaves brought to the United States in 1619. The Puritan colony of Plymouth, Massachusetts, was established in 1620. At the time colonial, there has never been centralized regulation of immigration. Hostility towards immigrants began when the first federal law excluding certain categories of immigrants as "undesirable", including immigrants from a particular country, was passed in 1875. And in 1864 there was the first attempt federal government to centralize immigration in 1864. Over the decades, more and more laws were passed to control immigration. For example, the Chinese Exclusion Act which prohibited all immigration of Chinese workers. Then there was the Quota Act of 1921, which was the first immigration law to impose numerical limits on immigration, capping overall immigration at around 350,000 per year and limiting immigration from a particular country to 3 percent of the number of people of that ancestry who lived. in the United States in 1910. The most important changein the United States' attitude toward immigration occurred in 2001, after multiple terrorist attacks devastated New York City and even the Pentagon. He created new government agencies and tightened restrictions on who is and is not allowed to enter. Perhaps the most important difference is that the Department of Homeland Security did not exist before 9/11. It was established in November 2002 with the passage of the Homeland Security Act, the employer replaced the Immigration and Naturalization Service and became responsible for imposing national protection and protecting the states -United against terrorism. The 3 main agencies created in DHS encompass Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). The most important obligations they fulfill after 9/11 include screening and collecting information on international travelers, additional screening and interviews with people of positive nationalities, and sharing information with others country. The United States began by making huge investments in immigration control, introducing DHS, and developing new, robust databases that did not exist. There is an entry and exit system, where they take fingerprints of everyone who enters and track people through many airports once they leave the country. They also track each foreign student. These strategies have been extended to the nearly 2,000-mile border between the United States and Mexico. “A mix of billions of dollars in new manpower, infrastructure, gadgets, and new or changed policies” has moved toward defending the southern border, the report says, and the number of undocumented immigrants who had to cross it has decreased. Opponents of sanctuary cities argue that they subvert the U.S. legal system and threaten public safety. “Sanctuary jurisdictions across the United States willfully violate federal law in an effort to protect aliens from removal from the United States,” President Donald Trump wrote in his executive order on sanctuary cities in January 2017. These jurisdictions have caused immeasurable harm to America. people and the very fabric of our Republic. Sanctuary supporters claim they only protect hard-working undocumented immigrants. They are breaking the law simply by being in the United States. Some have even committed serious crimes. Liberals protect deadly illegal alien criminals from federal law enforcement. Sanctuary cities have threatened public safety by allowing illegal immigrants to stay. Many alien criminals have been released from prison instead of being handed over to ICE. They will just continue to break the law over and over again. Sanctuary cities put many law-abiding citizens at risk. The U.S. government is in no way forcing police officers to act like ICE agents, critics of sanctuary cities say, but simply aims to coordinate efforts at the state and local levels. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that immigration law should be uniform across the country. , opponents note, and the presence of sanctuary cities and states endangers this uniformity. Law enforcement in sanctuary cities refuse to cooperate with ICE to keep illegal alien criminals off the streets. Elizabeth Alvarado and Rob Mickens lost their daughter Nisa Mickens, who was killed by members of the Salvadoran street gang MS-13 in Brentwood, NewYork. This should not happen to law-abiding citizens and it is all because the local police do nothing against illegal aliens. Sanctuary policies do nothing to build trust between immigrant communities and local law enforcement. They do not improve access to law enforcement services for immigrants; They have also not been shown to increase the likelihood that more immigrant crime victims will report the crimes. Rather, they destroy the confidence of the community as a whole that the laws will be faithfully enforced to preserve the quality of life for all. Despite widespread public outrage over the San Francisco sheriff's policies that resulted in the release of a man who had previously been deported five times and convicted of seven felonies, and who was subject to state detention 'ICE, which then killed Kathryn Steinle, makes it clear that some jurisdictions will not budge from their alien criminal sanctuary policies. It wasn't the first time something like this had happened. In 2014, a man was released by the Cook County sheriff after serving a 60-day sentence for domestic violence, despite being in ICE detention. Shortly after, in Romeoville, Illinois, he killed a 15-year-old girl named Brianna Valle and also shot her mother. In 2011, in Albion New York, a man was released after being released on bail for burglary, despite being detained by ICE. He then stabbed and killed Kathleen Byham, 45, outside a Walmart store. This happens because sanctuary cities release illegal aliens instead of turning them over to ICE for deportation. The refusal of local police to comply has become a big problem. Sanctuary cities should protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. “Sanctuary cities are good for everyone, whether documented or not. A community that promises to protect all its members thrives… Undocumented immigrants are like everyone else: we want to work hard, support our families, and pursue life, liberty, and happiness. When we witness real crimes, such as domestic violence or theft, we want to be able to report it without fear of being deported. Undocumented immigrants are very often victims of crime and extreme exploitation, especially when the perpetrators know they cannot seek help. Without the assurance of sanctuary city policies, undocumented people will be less likely to report a crime, making our cities less safe. everyone… When cities, counties, and even states implement sanctuary statuses, they relieve local law enforcement to assist in the inhumane practice of rounding people up. As a result, communities have agents with lower burdens and more engaged community members. Sanctuary cities mean stronger communities.” The statistics show on average “35.5 fewer crimes committed per 10,000 residents in sanctuary counties compared to non-sanctuary counties.” Not all immigrants are criminals, most of them are in the United States for a better life and better education. Many think they are just criminals and nothing else, but they are also people. People who want to succeed in life and who want their children to succeed in life as well. Media and researchers have found throughout the presidential campaign that immigrants who are in the country illegally are less likely to commit crimes or be incarcerated than the general population. The American Immigration Council noted.”