If we approach the ethics of an act from the perspective presented by Jhon Stuart Mill, we lean toward utilitarianism and believe that it is ethical , but in reality, we ultimately reduce notice to nothing. According to Haidt's idea, even though society has instilled in us the idea that everything becomes ethical if there is a greater good, we still have a vision that helps us differentiate right from wrong. This idea is an intuition and if we use it to judge the ethicality of an act, we would ultimately be doing what is in favor of everyone and not just the majority. One idea says that the means of an act can be justified by the end and that if that is the approach we take, then ultimately every act can be considered ethical, but the basis on which good and evil is judged depends on whether it is beneficial or not. is.Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay This is where this approach comes in and by only accepting it we challenge what tends to be human. An individual can never justify his actions even if only one person suffers harm; if not a person, then the life of an animal or plant. By ignoring fundamental questions such as how many people will be harmed, we try to escape the unethical aspects of our actions. If it is argued that by taking care of the needs of the majority, even if through unethical means, we can create in them a sense of happiness. and staff satisfaction is above all, this approach is somewhat justified but again still unacceptable. However, when compared to the completely opposite approach (deontology), considering ethical acts if they are beneficial to most people seems to be a better approach. Just because most people do it doesn't make it ethical. But for example, if you sit there and think about the simple question: If this happened to you, would you consider it good or bad? Faced with such a dilemma, ethical approaches fail to achieve their objective. This is why each approach is accurate, to some extent, for each individual. We each have a brain that helps us differentiate between right and wrong, also depending on the situation. Thus, an act can become ethical or unethical depending on the situation. Therefore, the question is always “How ethical…?” » and not “Why is this ethical…?” » We can never answer it from just one side and will always remain open to debate. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, how wrong or wrong this approach is varies from person to person and I think it is not entirely ethical to justify actions simply because 'a certain number of people benefit from it, even if it is the majority. But compared to other ideas, it may be ethical.