Table of ContentsIntroductionConclusionWorks CitedIntroductionCyberbullying is a term used to refer to the use of words, images, or other forms of communication on the Internet intended to harm or hurt. another individual. The term primarily applies to such acts committed by children against other children (Hunter, 2012). When it comes to adults, the term used will no longer be considered cyberharassment. We will rather speak of cyberharassment or cyber-harassment. Currently, there is no strict law in America prohibiting this practice, even though it has disastrous effects on victims. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Children who are victims of cyberbullying end up committing murder or committing suicide in extreme circumstances. Other effects of crime, somewhat mild and less harmful, include the fact that these children will eventually be removed and may therefore drop out of school. Opinions differ on whether authorities should impose harsher penalties on the perpetrators of this crime. Schools are considered the most effective institutions for controlling this stranglehold, but the law does not allow them to punish student misconduct committed off campus. So the question is: should there be laws in place to combat cyberbullying? The laws currently in force to combat cyberbullying are insufficient. No specific law authorizes school administrations to act in response to cyberbullying committed outside of school. Children were thus left at the mercy of nature, in the hands of rogue cyberbullies. The scale and scale of cyberbullying continues to grow over time and there are fears that over the next decade significant harm will be caused to children if appropriate laws are not put in place to control this vice. Current law provides for and protects the freedom of speech and expression of students. It is enshrined in the main law of the country. This right must, however, be used responsibly (Lipschultz, 2013). The question of how much is responsible, however, is ambiguous. It is unclear to what extent freedom of expression should be allowed, particularly in relation to children's communications on social media. On the other hand, schools have their own set of rules that students must follow regarding their communication with each other. These rules vary from school to school but share one commonality that communication must be respectful and full of mutual respect. Anything that cannot meet the minimum requirements of respect for other students is therefore deemed inappropriate and punishable. At school, cases of harassment of any kind do not occur. The ideal kind of respect between students is maintained and dominant. It facilitates a good learning environment for all students and provides them with a sense of pride regardless of their social status (Malik, 2010). The problem, however, is that school authorities are not allowed to continue monitoring children once they leave school. This is evidenced by the numerous lawsuits filed by parents and children's rights movements against school authorities for attempting to intervene in the lives of children outside of school. It is worth noting that in each case the cases are based on free speech claims. What these pressure groups and parents appreciate is the fact that children are safer if they aresubject to regulations on what to do and what not to do on the Internet. They focus too much on the short-term well-being of children when it comes to freedom of speech and expression. Technology has provided several untamed avenues that have become easy for cyberbullies to further their evil agenda. These cover the areas of telephone conversations and social media, which are currently the most form of abusive communication giving rise to cyberbullying allegations. Other forms include the use of anonymous websites that adolescents use to threaten and intimidate each other (Trolley, 2010). It is a fact that there have been several cases where children had to commit murder or commit suicide after being subjected to extreme torment due to the crimes mentioned above. The problem with cyberspace, which makes it the worst means of bullying, even more than other forms of bullying, is the fact that there is a certain sense of anonymity and little accountability on the part of the perpetrators who push them to act in this way. There is a sense of zero accountability from the comments; messages and photos published on these sites are not subject to any control by any authority. This relative freedom has encouraged criminals to do whatever they want when it comes to posting bad content on the web. Over the next decade, America will likely face serious cases of cyberbullying in the future. With the rapid and rapid pace of technological growth and the emergence of new forms of communication, it is logical to understand that the frequency of abuse will increase beyond the current situation (Kelsey, 2014). It should also be noted that several features of growing communication platforms will facilitate cyberbullying in the future. These avenues touch on the areas of ease of sending and receiving articles online, which has become the norm in the current state of technology. Communication is made easier because new inventions, especially in the field of mobile telephony, are accompanied by better versions of technology that now allow users to easily send and receive images and videos. An example of the latest invention that allows people to use it is WhatsApp technology, which allows people to share and post photos and videos as well as send text communications. Since its invention and adoption, millions of cases of children abusing it and bullying their colleagues have been reported. It should also be noted that the prevalence of these cases continues to increase over time. It is therefore common knowledge that over the next decade, the situation will get worse if appropriate laws are not put in place to bring the situation under control. One of the reasons why there should be strict laws regulating the use or abuse of the Internet communication platform. is that the effects of the vice on the victims are too overwhelming. They are not comparable to the attacks on freedom of expression that such laws will cause. For the sake of children's safety on the web, laws should be formulated to curb any errant behavior on the part of any of them. It is a collective negotiation between the government, parents and school administrations to discuss and agree to limit children's rights on the Internet. The second reason why cyberbullying needs to be controlled is that there are many cases of children dropping out of school or performing poorly. The level of intimidation and mental torture that children experience because of..