-
Essay / Why Internet Censorship is a Bad Idea
In modern times, information is very easy to obtain. It's different when you compare it to the previous age. Today, thanks to the Internet, we can get information wherever and whenever we want. The Internet provides fluid data and information for us to view. Users can find any information they want, such as information about a car, information about how to cook a certain dish, information about education, etc. They can find almost everything without any limitations thanks to the Internet. Although the Internet can be accessed from anywhere and at any time, the Internet is open to everyone, but some countries have decided to ban or censor certain resources on the Internet. “The reasons why they restricted certain access are varied, starting with the content being bad, the content being copyrighted, the government not wanting the citizen to see the content, etc.” Internet censorship may seem good, but in reality, it is a bad idea because it negatively impacts Internet users in many forms. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original EssayNowadays, thanks to the Internet, we can search for any information we want. A study among young students found that about 97% of students obtained information through the Internet rather than using the library (Aktay 2018). Based on the research, we can say that most of the students used the Internet to study rather than going to the library because it is more convenient. If the government limits access to the Internet it will have a direct impact on students because most of them use the Internet to find materials and sources to study and limiting access would mean limiting the ability of students to s improve or learn new things. would likely impact the quality of education in the country itself. Government censors forced users to use VPNs or other similar tools to bypass technical censorship filters (2017). The main goal of censorship is to block access to a certain website, but it also encourages users to use another alternative to bypass the censored website by using a VPN. The government's efforts to block certain websites are considered useless and the money invested in the censorship project will be wasted, because what is the point of censorship if users can bypass the censorship system. A concrete example of internet censorship is Article 13. which is published by the EU. So, what is Article 13 and what impact does it have on the Internet? Article 13 is part of the new EU Copyright Directive which covers how to deal with copyrighted content online such as films, television, games and songs (Fox 2019 ). From the definition, we can say that Article 13 is a law to limit the share of copyrighted content on the Internet. Article 13 requires online platforms to filter or remove copyrighted material from their websites. What Section 13 wants is to remove any copyrighted material from a website that is problematic for a website that relies on user-generated content such as YouTube , Facebook, Twitter, etc. something like this is a problem because section 13 can kill the internet. himself. Most of the content posted by the user on social media may consist of images such as memes, links andvideos. With Article 13, people cannot freely share images like memes on social media, memes are intended for entertainment or humor purposes for Internet users. If users aren't allowed to share memes, that means they're not allowed to have fun on the internet. Additionally, memes can be used for satire and criticism, and if banned, it amounts to limiting users' freedom of expression. Besides image sharing, another website that relies on user-generated content, such as Twitch, is also struggling. Video game content is owned by the game's developer and publisher, so streamers and platforms on which Ilsuse could potentially be held liable for copyright violations under Section 13 by streaming or uploading content gaming videos without permission. Twitch users usually stream live gameplay and gameplay is copyrighted content. If Article 13 is in effect, the streamer is committing a crime and possibly the streamer will lose their job while Twitch will lose a user who generates content. This can impact streamers' careers and Twitch's business, which would be very bad for both the streamer and Twitch. Besides Article 13 created by the EU, North Korea also limits internet access, but it is even worse than the article. 13. In North Korea, normal citizens do not have access to the Internet; the privilege of accessing the Internet is left to a select number of people in the country, known as elites, as well as some academics and scientists (Lee 2012). It seems horrible that normal citizens cannot access the Internet and that they will never know the credibility of the information they received. They can be misled by the government with false information or even manipulated with false information and for the rest of their lives they will do it. I never know the truth. The normal citizen will also find it difficult to interact with people outside their country because they do not have the privilege of accessing the Internet. North Korea has developed its own devices such as smartphones, tablets and software including Red Star 3.0, an operating system that mimics IOS and these products have been carefully designed to control and monitor user information. Red Star 3.0 has monitoring capabilities and the intranet interface, Kwangmyong, is configured to make it appear as if the user has full access to the Internet. An analysis of Red Star's capabilities by tech media outlet Fast Company found that its approximately 5,000 web pages contain mostly propaganda (Jerreat 2017). To limit interactions with the outside world, North Korea has created its own devices. The problem is that these devices are designed to monitor users. Even with a communication device, citizens cannot have their own private time when using it because the government is constantly monitoring them and it feels like they are not allowed to have private time when they use the devices. In addition to devices, web pages on the Internet in North Korea consist of propaganda that can be harmful to citizens. Imagine if a child in North Korea surfs the Internet and the only thing he can find is propaganda. The child will be brainwashed by propaganda, which will affect his state of mind and can directly affect his future. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Some People.