The discussion of direct violence, structural violence, and cultural violence in this chapter is relatively straightforward, focusing on the direct violence of murders, the structural violence of Nazi occupation, and the restrictions placed on the farmer and cultural violence in Landa's descriptions of Jews as "vermin" (linking them to the bubonic plague), as well as the symbols that support his role as a killer, such as the skull and crossbones insignia on his hat. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay This chapter also shows us to what extent the farmer, who ends up giving up on the family he is hiding, is an actor with will. This is seen in two cases, one where the farmer decides to sit down after Landa says, "Please join me at your table", and the other when he asks Landa if he could smoke his pipe. The question that now arises is whether the level of cultural and structural violence in the chapter excludes the possibility of cooperation and assistance on the part of the farmer. Then another question that arises is how the farmer perceived Landa's threats, which at first were rather mild (commenting about the dairy farm, the farmer's milk and his family), but progressed to become much more obvious. Returning to the concept of Galtung's triangle of violence, the question arises as to how we should categorize the different threats in this particular chapter. Is it direct violence (since the threatened violence clearly is), structural violence (since it excludes possible actions on the part of the farmer), or cultural violence (since it is explicitly communicated ) ? In my opinion, there is no correct answer to this question, because it is obviously clear to us that the three types of violence – direct, cultural and structural – are closely related to each other, thus further illustrating the Galtung theory of the relationship between types of violence. The scene is clearly written and directed to push our sympathies towards the farmer. Looking at the cultural violence rooted against Jews in the anti-Semitic views of Hitler and the Nazis, we see the way Landa conceptualizes his work of hunting and killing Jews as a "job," in the commercial sense of the term, with records, as well as how he describes this as a “job” that he was “ordered to do.” He goes further to discuss the “company” which is now under “new management”. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay The embedded cultural violence presented in this scene can be looked at another way. The chapter begins by showing us a tall, well-built man, sweating profusely, with an ax in his hand: the farmer, Monsieur LaPadite. Landa is presented to us as a small but lively and precise man. Given that the two men are alone in the house, threatening such a large and aggressive man could have turned out badly for Landa, but instead LaPadite, despite being indirectly threatened, abandons the family that he protects rather than killing Landa and being killed. finished with that. This clearly indicates the position and fear that Landa occupies and commands as “JEW HUNTER.”.