blog




  • Essay / Why The Canterbury Tales Should Not Be Banned

    Nowadays, topics such as rape, revenge and criticism of the Church are viewed in scandalous and shocking ways. As for Geoffrey Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, these questions are obvious and recognized. In the novel, some tales address and illustrate these vulgar topics and how different it was hundreds of years ago. Chaucer applies uncensored reproaches to controversial subjects, in the tales, to contradict orthodox beliefs on these issues, and that some of them are not as insensitive as they seem. The Canterbury Tales should not be canceled in schools because it provides a sense of entertainment, perspective, morality and a distinct narrative to each tale. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay The overall storyline of The Canterbury Tales is that of a group of unique people who venture out on a pilgrimage. They all go to Canterbury to visit Saint Thomas Beckett. The host, Harry Bailey, proposes the idea of ​​a storytelling competition between the "pilgrims". Each person tells a story, real or fictional, that explores one or two conversation-provoking themes. Some areas of interest are indirectly involved, such as criticism of the Church. These implications are displayed in tales such as "The Brother's Tale", "The Summoner's Tale", and "The Forgiveness Tale". The Summoner and Friar's Tales throw jabs at each other while The Pardoner discusses his own wrongdoings and sins. Chaucer includes these insinuations about the three members of the Church to emphasize the corruption of the Church. While some may find these remarks offensive, they provide insight into the juxtaposition of conventional perceptions of the Church. The reader's responsibility is to form an opinion and identify with the information provided. According to an article written by Martin Stevens and Kathleen Falvey, "Chaucer surely wrote The Canterbury Tales to seduce us with its characters and their performances, and the road drama has everything to do with our understanding of the tales that are told throughout the path. taverns or “at the end of the crowds”. But that's precisely the problem. He provided characters as a means to a larger goal: our understanding of how each fiction is shaped by its storyteller and how the goals of storytelling differ significantly with the storyteller's intention and public perception. Furthermore, regarding "The Pardoner's Tale", it reads: "Read as a performance, The Canterbury Tales are entertainment, an escape from the tedium of monotonous travel. On this level, the Tale of Forgiveness offers the most interesting drama of the entire pilgrimage – seductive enough that we want to understand it fully as an event.” Even literary experts believe that The Canterbury Tales insinuate a sense of fun. “The Story of Forgiveness” demonstrates that sinners have a sense of justice. Again, “it’s not that the forgiver is telling a “moral thing”; it is that he himself becomes an integral part of a “moral thing” that Chaucer recounts.” Many might argue that these religious accounts demonstrate a sense of animosity towards the Church of London. However, this is really just Chaucer's interpretation of his lack of scruples and lack of malicious intent. As for revenge, it plays a completely different story. “The act of taking revenge on oneself or others; inflict injury or punishment in retaliation; the harm or harm caused.