-
Essay / Compare and Contrast Beowulf and Gilgamesh - 1222
His selflessness is on full display after Hygelac's death, where "...Hygd offered him the throne and authority as lord of the treasury..." (165). Instead of accepting the offer, Beowulf refuses on the grounds that he could not “…be raised above Heardred as her lord or undertake the office of kingship…” (165). It is only when Heardred is killed that he finally agrees to take the throne (166). Beowulf's actions and his initial refusal to ascend the throne show that he cares more about the well-being of others and the order of succession than assuming power; a sure sign of altruism. Later, during the last moments of his life, Beowulf, weak and dying, speaks to Wiglaf one last time and says: "...I give thanks to see this treasure here before me, to have been allowed to leave my people so well. endowed on the day of my death. Now that I have given my last breath to possess this fortune, it is up to you to take care of their needs…” (174). Once again, Beowulf's altruism wins. Even in his dying state, one of his main priorities was to ensure that all of his people would be taken care of and live happily. The same cannot be said of Gilgamesh, who represents quite the contrast. Both Beowulf and Gilgamesh are great exponents of the term "epic hero" by displaying almost legendary levels of grandeur, power, and strength. However, their differences are significant enough that one can clearly