IntroductionThe Orange Revolution was presented as a series of protests as well as political events that occurred in Ukraine from late November 2004 to January 2005. This happened after the race. out of the vote in the 2004 presidential election. The Ukrainian presidential election was reportedly marked by corruption, electoral fraud as well as intimidation of voters who voted for the opposition (Arel, 168). Ukraine's capital, kyiv, was the main anchor point of the civil resistance movement. Thousands of protesters and activists were circulating everywhere and organizing their demonstrations daily. There was a national revolution by Democrats, characterized by a series of actions including civil disobedience, general strikes and sit-ins. All these activities were organized by the opposition movement with the aim of making their voices and opinions heard. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The demonstrations were dared by the reports that were made by the various information from indicators and national and foreign electoral observers who The information disseminated in public opinion believe that the results of the second round were rigged. The second round of voting was to take place on November 21, 2004 and the candidates in the running were Viktor Yushchenko and Victor Yanukovych. Viktor Yanukovych was declared the winner of the hotly contested seat. The new protests were prepared when the results of the first round were announced and the Supreme Court of Ukraine ordered a new vote on December 26, 2004 (Kuzio, Taras 253). This situation has been the subject of in-depth examination, carried out by international observers as well as national electoral experts. The second round was announced as fair and equitable (Kissinger, Henry 88). The final results clearly show that Yushchenko won 52% over his rival Yanukiosh, whose score was 44%. This marks the end of the Orange Revolution, as after the declaration of the winner, the inauguration ceremony took place on January 23, 2005 in the national capital. In the years that followed, the Orange Revolution had a negative outlook in federal circles in Belarus and Russia. Yanukovych was declared the winner of the presidential elections that took place in 2010. This happened after the Central Election Commission and a panel of international observers reported and declared that the presidential elections were fair ( Arel, 168). It is important to note that Yanukovych was ousted from power after four years when the first Eurozone clashes took place in February 2014 in the national capital, kyiv's Independence Square. These results led to the deaths of many protesters and activists, leaving more than 100 dead between February 20 and 20. Some of the research questions that were used to determine the study include, what were the impacts of the Orange movement and what did they do? succeed in their daily struggle? Have there been any changes in political bodies, parties, political institutions, leadership and regional political directions in Ukraine after the Orange Revolution? If so, were the changes evolutionary or revolutionary? What were the impacts of the changes necessary for the fight for democracy in Ukraine? The political reform came into effect after the 2006 elections and was implemented by the parliament (Kuzio, Taras 238). It was the result of a compromise between the Orange leaders and the Orange Party of the National Congress.This has impacted the country since it moved from a presidential-parliamentary republic to a parliamentary-presidential republic. The Socialist Party of the Regions and the Communist Party switched sides and joined a coalition composed of the Party of the Regions and the Communist Party. Opposition leader Viktor Yanukovych was appointed Prime Minister of Ukraine and this time was given more power than during the Orange Revolution. The foreign policy implications were crucial for Ukraine as well as neighboring post-communist countries like Russia and Poland. Revolutionary changes would only reveal a deviation of the ruling parties, leaders and the population from the pro-Russian party. orientation which would be an evolution towards a pro-Western life orientation of their foreign policy (Arel, 168). This would particularly affect the North Atlantic Treaty Association, NATO. The ideology of NATO membership would only divide the country for both the United States and Russia. It is remarkable that the Orange Revolution produced evolutionary changes in political institutions, parties, leaders as well as values ​​that were holding back Ukraine. Rather, the revolution consisted of rapid changes that varied widely and fundamental changes called evolution. This system of political change was thought to be slow and complex. Evolutionary change lay between revolutionary transformation and political stagnation. The main hypothesis of this work is that the Orange Revolution produced the evolutionary changes. These changes have taken place in the political institutions, parties, leaders and values ​​prevailing in Ukraine. The evolutionary changes associated with the Orange Revolution lie between revolutionary transformation and political stagnation. The development was revealed by the political reforms carried out in the country. The causes of the Orange Revolution can be considered the public outburst following the presidential election of 2004. Compatriots were impatient during this period and expected a transformation in the political and economic fields of their country. However, the election was believed to have been fraudulent and caused the death of the events that had taken place there before (Kissinger, Henry 105). The Ukrainian regime that ruled before the Orange Revolution paved the way for creating a path that would facilitate the emergence of a democratic society. This was based on the competitive authoritarian regime, considered a hybrid regime, because it guaranteed democracy and the economic health of the economy. The fraud seen in the elections has put more emphasis on citizens to have a more pluralistic government. This would obviously spark the public's desire to create a social reform movement. This was only intended to undermine the people's respect for Kuchma's presidency, which included the elite as well as the ruling class. The Orange movement focuses more on the change of power, changes in political institutions; parties, leaders as well as attitudes in Ukraine. This study uses election poll data, opinion poll data, the daily review of major Ukrainian media as well as Western news sources on politics in Ukraine. The study also includes BBC news and field research before, during and after the November 2004 presidential elections (Arel, 199). It also uses data on the political crisis that occurred in 2007, particularly the early parliamentary elections that were used to determine whether changes in Ukraine were revolutionary or evolutionary.The article focuses on major areas such as the political institutions that were impacted before and after the Orange Revolution, the orientation as well as the behavior and background of the main leaders of the Orange Revolution as well as the opposition. The third question concerns the evolution of national support for the main political parties since the legislative elections of 2002. The fourth question addressed by the issue is the evolution of national support experienced by the main presidential party.candidates since the presidential elections of 2004. At the end of 2002, Viktor Yushchenko, Petro Symonenko, Oleksandr Moroz and Yulia Tymoshenko made a joint statement in which they expressed concern about the state of developments in Ukraine. The communists withdrew from the formed alliance and Syomonenko found himself against a candidate who was part of the team competing in the 2004 Ukrainian presidential elections (Kuzio, Taras 243). The other three candidates, however, remained close friends. In the fall of 2001, Yushchenko and Tymoshenko reached an agreement that they should create an alliance. Yulia Tymoshenko and our Ukraine formed a coalition called People's Force, the main goal of which was to stop the process that seemed destructive due to the ruling power. authorities and became a component of Ukraine (Kissinger, Henry 123). In 2004, the presidential election featured two candidates, Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych, widely supported by outgoing President Kuchma, and opposition candidate Viktor Yushchenko. He was the leader of the Ukrainian faction in the Ukrainian parliament and once served as prime minister. The elections took place in a very charged and intense atmosphere. Yanukovych's team and the outgoing president's administration used their government control and state resources to intimidate Yushchenko's supporters. What's more, in 2004, Yushchenko was poisoned under unclear circumstances (Kuzio, Taras 253). However, he survived and resumed his campaigns, but the poisoning undermined his health and appeared in public drastically. His face, however, has remained disfigured to this day due to the poisoning. Kuchma's behavior was marred by scandals and he lost many supporters as well as high positions in the government. The many government officials who stood by him fully supported Yushchenko's election and his ideas during his election trial. Due to the Ukrainian people's lack of faith, Yushchenko's role was never important to the revolution, even though he was a charismatic aspirant who showed no signs of corruption (Arel, 206). He presented his ideas for the nation in a non-Soviet way and was on the same level as his voters. The younger generation who voted at that time played a very important role in determining the outcome of the 2004 presidential election. However, they had a different perspective than they wanted on the main figures of the Ukrainian government. They experienced a lot of negativity from Kuchma and therefore had a very skewed view of Kuchma's ability to lead the country for a longer period of time. The large population of young people who participated in the vote demonstrated an immense sense of nationalism and therefore brought out very diverse ideas on how to develop their country. The Orange Revolution was influential enough to impact people of all ages. Orange was initially adopted by Yushchenko's activists and was seen as the signature color that would be used for his election campaigns. Later, the color gave the name to all of the.