Table of contentsIntroductionThe objectiveFindings and recommendationsCapabilitiesCase study: VietnamConclusionRecommendationIntroductionNaval forces around the world more or less help the respective nations to build up their military power around or over- beyond. For the Navy, its core force is measured in number of ships rather than personnel, and of course, due to the characteristics, functions and equipment of each ship, capacity could be determined differently. Among all criteria, the Navy generally focuses on the ship's effectiveness in terms of ship combat capability. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayThe GoalAny consideration of a country's ship capabilities or the effectiveness of its ships must begin with an examination of the resources - financial, human, physical and technological - that national leaders make available to their military organizations. These resources are clearly a function of the greater means possessed by an army at the level of the navy as well as the imperatives arising from the performance of the navy, that is to say the pressures exerted by external threats, and as a whole, they can perceive problems and develop satisfactory solutions. and recommendationAcquisitionsIt is essential to improve the readiness and responsiveness of the Navy, especially in the case of current extreme terrorist threats in every country and around the world. Tellis et al. once analyzed in their book “Measuring National Power in the Post-Industrial Age” (2000, p.136) that the size of the defense budget serves to identify the relative importance of a country's powerful body compared to others. Importantly, by understanding the distribution of expenditures on operations and maintenance, research and development, naval power can be identified (according to reference C). Indeed, it is true that the purchase of new ships with extraordinary capability, especially for countries that have a tight or scant defense budget, does not seem to be able to afford it. To do this, each country must generate and identify a significant defense budget intended for a navy. Additionally, a thorough understanding of the distribution of funds provides a country with an initial insight to address potential threats, improve its combat capability, and demonstrate its military might. Subsequently, providing predictable, long-term funding for the maintenance of all equipment is also an essential activity for the Navy. First of all, an effective investment to directly improve the ship's capability is to renew, replace and maintain basic equipment, and continue to strengthen national defense. This option is very convenient for countries with tight budgets as mentioned above. At the same time, long-term financing distribution activity should not only be safe and stable, but also carried out periodically, as it will provide a relatively accurate and reliable overview of vessel capacity and lead to a deeper understanding and to more precise procedures to improve its capability.Personnel trainingDue to the assessment of "Measuring National Power in the Post-Industrial Era" (p138), the size and quality of the navy's human resources are the type of resource which gives an overview of a country's naval power in general and the capability of ships. soldiers in particular. The size of a military force is the primary indicator of military strength, and the quality of its fighting is thesecond. Being a healthy military workforce means that every soldier demands levels of professional training from officers or levels of technical proficiency. All information provides a substantive assessment of the character of the military establishment and its potential success in the event of conflict (as per Reference C). The leader of the Navy in general and of each ship in particular should promote the quality of life of its soldiers, create strong, healthy communities and secure jobs. Another indirect way to support the ship's capability is to provide the men and women of the NPV with the necessary equipment and resources that enable them to perform their jobs with high levels of professional and personal satisfaction. Keep in mind that updating officer and sailor training programs to adapt to changing new equipment and the security environment is a necessary task. Ship Infrastructure The extent and quality of the ship's infrastructure is the other type of resource that impacts the quality of the ship's capacity. This category includes the physical infrastructure possessed by a naval force. In addition to the facilities normally used to house the ship's personnel and equipment, this category should evaluate the number and quality of testing and training ranges, medical facilities, and construction projects. Infrastructure must ultimately be evaluated based on its ability to support the warfighter, with quality assessments ultimately becoming an integral part of the analysis. Combat Skill Another type of resource affecting the ship's capability is combat skill, both in number and quality. Tellis et al. (2000) determined that this activity can only be carried out through the cooperation of many institutions, for example academic institutions, specialized combat associations and technical centers (according to reference C). The arts, supported by cyber-intelligent technology, require a series of specialized activities focused on combat research and development. Today's security environment requires every modernized navy to ensure operations on land, at sea and in the air. Navy leaders can create more combat rehearsals as well as increase the number of tactical exercises and the number of ships and exercise time, creating an opportunity for the Navy. armed forces to train, respond and adapt to the fluctuating security environment. In addition, investments in modern capabilities will strengthen the capabilities of the Naval Guards in national defense and international collaboration.CapabilitiesImprove requirementsIn the context of the global security situation becoming more complex, continue to protect the nation and defend the interests strategies in the world while continuing the fight against terrorism, there is a demand for each country's navy to develop. In the maritime domain, many national navies need to expand their fleets to have more ships in order to compete with other world powers and fight terrorism. We need a new model of shipbuilding that can cost-effectively deliver significant capacity increases at low production rates. To achieve this, the Navy requires targeted and strategic investments in capabilities and equipment that can be used in domestic and international military operations. The Navy must be a versatile military force, capable of providing the government, citizens and other partners and allies with a broad range of options to respond in auncertain security environment. Without investment in capabilities, a nation's ability to defend and respond to emerging threats is at risk. To begin, considering more effective offensive and defensive naval capabilities, one of the most valuable investments in the Navy is acquiring new or improved capabilities. naval intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance systems, improved weaponry and additional systems for current and future platforms. Considering the recent Canadian Armed Forces Strategy document as a good document to follow, as the Navy requires an alternative airborne platform that can be operated from the Multi-Role Patrol Frigates to provide timely ISTAR information almost real. This capability will generate a tactical advantage for commanders while minimizing risk to the frigate or maritime helicopter in support of single to multi-threat operations. Each ship set will include: unmanned aircraft, payloads, ground control station/multi-domain control station, communications (data link system), and support element (maintenance/storage)” (Lt. -Commander Ernie MacNeil RCN, 2018) (according to reference A). To achieve offensive and defensive operational naval capabilities, high-level mandatory requirements are necessary, as follows: Remain airborne for at least 6 hours; Operate remotely at least 50 NM from a frigate equipped with an ISTAR maritime sensor suite; Operate from a frigate. day and night in difficult weather conditions; Support operations by transferring up-to-date data to controlling and participating divisions; Extend SA to a minimum range of 80 NM from the ship depending on combat activities; Operate in a contested and electromagnetically cluttered environment. Vice Admiral Tom Moore of the US Navy (2017) once said that the Navy could seek more help from small defense contractors to maintain aircraft carriers and submarines, with the aim of enabling shipbuilders to build new boats. By hiring other companies, the Navy can free up capacity to build, test, maintain and repair its ships. Given the current workload of many naval forces around the world, it is difficult to imagine an overcapacity situation in the near future. Firstly, this provides seafarers with a level of stability in public yards to allow them to focus on the basic work they need to do to get ships out on time (Sputnik, 2018) (according to reference B ). In another way, the creation of joint ventures and licensing agreements with foreign companies would help reduce the cost of building new modern ships. This is a relatively effective option for developing countries. On the one hand, they can achieve the goal of acquiring and improving ship capacity. On the other hand, these countries have the opportunity to access high-quality maritime products. Additionally, by transferring technology, they can then research and develop their own ships to meet their own country's goals and requirements.Case Study: VietnamTaking Vietnam as an example, in December 2009, Vietnam signed a contract worth $2 billion for the purchase of six Kilo submarines of Project 636 Varshavyanka (NATO designated it as Kilo Improvement). In addition to shipbuilding, the contract includes the training of Vietnamese sailors, the supply of equipment and techniques. The Kilo submarine group marks an important step in the equipment modernization processmilitary and military and improving the combat power of the Vietnamese People's Navy. Kilo submarines, together with surface ships and guard ships, constitute modern means of patrolling, reconnaissance and protection of naval bases, coastal areas and the territorial sea of ​​​​Vietnam. On February 28, 2017, during the flag-raising ceremony of the two submarines HQ-186 Da Nang and HQ-187 Ba Ria-Vung Tau, Prime Minister Nguyen Xuan Phuc affirmed that the modernization of the navy and the development of the submarine force are a priority. normal employment of the maritime nation. It is not an arms race, nor a means of deterrence towards the countries of the region, but a firm protection of the sovereignty of the sea, the islands and the continental shelf of the country in all circumstances (according to reference E). Kilo is a class of diesel-electric attack submarines, tasked with anti-submarine warfare and anti-ship missiles launched from submarines. It is the third most advanced submarine in the world, 74 meters long, 10 meters wide, displacement 3,100 meters, 20 knots (37 km/h), deep dive 300 meters, independent operation 45 days and nights, crew of 52 people. It is equipped with 6 torpedo tubes measuring 533 mm in diameter. Among all these weapons, the most powerful weapon is the Klub-S multirole cruise missile. The complex consists of at least five different types of missiles, which allow the submarine to select a flexible weapon in combat (Truong Minh Vu and Nguyen The Phuong, 2017) (according to reference D). To be honest, without technology transfer, it will be difficult for Vietnam, with its internal capabilities, to build a modern submarine with modern equipment and sophisticated technologies like the Kilo alone. Meanwhile, the amount spent by Vietnam to purchase these six submarines amounts to $1.8 billion. In addition, Russia also provided training centers (in Cam Ranh), underwater weapons such as torpedoes, 3M54E cruise missiles and 3M14E cruise missiles for land attacks (similar to the type of Russian missiles used to attack IS troops in Syria). In total, the total cost of submarines, weapons and equipment amounts to $4 billion. Indeed, it really is a good deal. Thanks to the efforts of the Vietnamese Navy and the naval technology of navies such as Russia, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, Vietnam have the opportunity to build onboard grenades, 100mm DKZ cannons, improve anti-ship capabilities. coastal defense system. For example, it can be said that this 100mm mortar was completely developed by Vietnamese engineers, not any mortar model in the world. Its structure is similar to the traditional mortar, but the caliber type, as well as the caliber size, is completely different from American, Russian and many other countries' mortars. Currently, Vietnam has successfully researched and manufactured many types of advanced radars such as the RV-02 of the Vietnam Military Academy, the VRS-M2D medium-range airborne radar, and the VRS- short-range maritime surveillance radar. 2DM from the Viettel group. These radars (radio equipment, sonar to detect submarines) not only meet the need to modernize Vietnam's "skyline", but also provide numerous opportunities for export abroad. In the field of submarines, Vietnam does not need to depend too much on Russia for the repair or maintenance of these submarines, because Vietnam will be able to repair its submarines and modernize the maintenance, repair and overhaul of warships, according to the British Ministry.