The American science writer Michael Brant Shermer once uttered a sublime thought in one of his works: “Science and spirituality are complementary and not contradictory; additive and not harmful. Anything that generates a feeling of respect can be a source of spirituality” [Michael Shermer, Why Darwin Matters: The Case Against Intelligent Design (New York: Times Books, 2006)]. This thought seems to be a plausible and coherent response to the much-debated point of the relationship between spiritual standards and science. However, life would be tedious without different views on essential life issues. Therefore, contemplating the mind of a passionate creationist arguing for an uncompromising claim instead of conforming to both sides is mesmerizing. So what is the relationship between science and morality for William Jennings Bryan in his final statement at the trial of John Scopes in 1925? Morality is endangered by science. To be more precise, Christianity is threatened because of theories of evolution, because evolution propagates misleading and unproven hypotheses, because it does not provide the necessary spiritual elements, and because the idea of ​​selection natural is opposed to the loving nature of God. unproven hypotheses spread more easily. This is perilous, because teaching evolution leads many students down the wrong path and destroys their religious faith. Charles Darwin himself is a striking example: “We have the effect of evolution on its most eminent representative; it led [Darwin] from an orthodox Christian, believing every word of the Bible and in a personal God, from the bottom up […] to a helpless and hopeless agnosticism. Evolution rejects all miracles performed by God because they are unconscious and do not teach brotherly love. God's teachings alone can resolve the problems that torment the heart and perplex the world. Science discourages people from seeking improvement and therefore endangers morality. It's obvious that Bryan would never have agreed with Michael Shermer. Science and morality are contradictory and degrading (harmful? Or opposed), not additive and complementary. There are many reasons to fear the effects of evolution on the minds of humanity. Morality is at war with science, because science threatens the morality of the world and eliminates all sense of responsibility. "God may be indifferent to evolutionists, and an afterlife may have no appeal to them, but the mass of humanity will continue to worship their Creator and will continue to find comfort in the promise of his Savior that he went to him. prepare a place for them. Amen!