blog




  • Essay / Why women in combat are not a good option

    Currently, about 14% of active duty military personnel are and there has been a long debate about letting women serve in combat MOS ( military professional specialty); however, in 2014 it was decided that combat MOS would be open to women. Although there are obviously women who could meet the same physical and physiological standards as men in combat, women should not be integrated into combat units because there is neither need nor benefit to integrating them and they have a negative impact on the squadron. In combat, women tend to be less physically fit, perform worse in lethal drills, and get injured far more than men. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The Marine Corps conducted an experiment in which they tested all male infantry squads and gender-inclusive squads in numerous exercises. Most female Marines did not have the same physical skills as men. During the experiment, "researchers connected marine men and women to various monitors and found that the top 25th percentile of women overlapped with the bottom 25th percentile of men in anaerobic power, a measure of strength ". This illustrates that even women in the upper strength range are seriously below the average strength level of men. Even though some women can achieve strength levels similar to men, there is simply no reason to join combat teams, as there are far more men than women with strength levels. high strength. A similar situation occurred "during casualty evacuation assessments, there were notable differences in turnaround times between all-male groups and gender-integrated groups, except where teams were conducting a evacuation of the wounded by a Navy firefighter carrying another (in which case it was most often a male Marine who “evacuated” the casualty).” This explains a huge problem with squadron integration. In war, seconds are minutes and minutes are hours, so it could be extremely dangerous for female Marines to need significantly more time to evacuate wounded or casualties. came to lethality exercises, such as combat maneuvers and shooting. “Male provisional infantry (those without formal 03xx school training) had higher pass percentages than female 0311 (school-trained): M4: 44% versus 28%, M27: 38% against 25%, M16A4w/M203: 26% against 15. %” (SCRS). Female Marines who had received infantry training were still significantly worse in shooting and accuracy than male Marines who had not received infantry training. This is extremely important, as marksmanship is one of the primary infantry skills. Additionally, "when negotiating the wall obstacle, male Marines would throw their packs to the top of the wall, while female Marines required regular assistance to get their packs to the top." This is extremely important, as male Marines should not have to worry about providing ongoing additional assistance to female Marines during a period of battle. Having to worry about their female counterparts will negatively affect their mission productivity. It has also been proven that women are much more prone to combat injuries than men. " During..