blog
media download page
Essay / Effects of Rice Import Dependence on Agriculture in the Philippines and demand caused by production problems and the increase in the population consuming rice as a staple food. Republic Act 11203 or also known as the Rice Tariffication Act, which liberalized the import, export and trade of rice, lifted the quantitative restrictions imposed on imported goods and was replaced by customs duties incurred by the Philippines under the Uruguay Round of the World Trade Organization. But instead of liberalizing, it has led to a system more dependent on imports, giving the government a false sense of food security. This study will show the effects of such a configuration on rice production, its producers and the Philippine economy as a whole, affecting its position in global stratification. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayIntroductionThe Philippines is known to be one of the major importers of rice in the international market. Throughout history and culture, rice has been the staple food of every household in the country. The importance of rice to the Filipino community has led to its place among the commodities that must be secured to ensure food security and which must be managed by the National Food Authority, as it has been mandated to do. Years of consumption, population increase, and costly and labor-intensive propagation of palay as a staple plant, along with the climatic conditions and geographical configuration of the natural calamity-prone Philippines, have given to the government's resolution to formulate a system dependent on imports of recently emerged rice to ensure its continued availability of supply with a stable price.Main allegationsThe dependence on the importation of rice which has been permitted by laws promulgated by the government and has been used by the National Food Authority with the Ministry of Agriculture and the Ministry of Trade and Industry to ensure food security through buffer stock and for price stabilization. The laws allowed the price of rice to fluctuate due to transportation costs caused by rice importation. The National Food Authority choosing to depend on rice imports gives a false food security that depends on foreign suppliers, not only does it discourage rice farmers from planting such products for domestic use due to the decreasing value of palay due to its foreign competitors who, even if they benefited from customs duties, can still dominate the market. The fact that the country often faces natural disasters reduces the survival rate of these crops, hampering its profitable yields, which not only affects the agricultural industry, especially rice production, and farmers, but also the economy through the trade deficit. The National Food Authority and the Ministry of Agriculture which should focus on establishing independence in food safety. The country experiences false security of supply due to its dependence on rice imports, which depends on an external factor. This has led to the emergence of agricultural problems such as surplus production of other crops which affects their prices in the market, leading farmers todivert their production to products intended for export, which may be limited and regulated by their standards, to such volume and priced. in other countries. On the other hand, the production of rice, the country's staple food, is in deficit.Definition of termsFood security: the marginal equilibrium stock of food that must be maintained by the National Food Authority in case of emergency must be used as a buffer stock to avoid shortage in the marketBuffer stock: is the quantity of food products retained by the National Food Authority to be used to circulate in the market. Diminishing Value: is the depreciation of the real price of a good relative to the production base due to certain factors.Palay: is a commodity of which rice is the by-product.Tariff: is the implicit tax on goods imported from another country instead of restrictive quotas as defined in RA no. 11203Quantitative restriction: are measures such as quotas, bans, and licensing requirements imposed by the government to limit the volume of a particular product that enters the country. Trade deficit: is the difference between import and export which has a deterrent effect for the importing country.MethodologyThis study used desk research and case method the combination of which shows an in-depth understanding of the problem as well as its implications in the situation. It will provide both information from other work and also applications for situational samples. ResultsThe national food authority which has been mandated to ensure national food security and stabilize the supply and prices of basic cereals, both at the level of farms and consumers. Given this role, he participated in the TRI of RA 11203 to liberalize rice trade, which backfired on the local rice industry and instead of giving it an equal fight with foreign competitors, gave the government an opportunity to cut costs and demand for a cheaper price of palay, leading the local industry to its demise. AnalysisThe logic of rice pricing was to encourage farmers to plant rice while giving them an advantage over importers. But with improper implementation of the TRI of RA 11203, the government will be the one to decide what the rice tariffication funds should be allocated for, which defeats its main purpose, which is to help farmers responsible for local rice production to support the growing demand at the national level. It was mentioned that even if there was a greater production of rice this year, there would still be a greater importation of rice to ensure food security and there is no more quantitative restriction to maintain the importation of rice only at tariff and ASEAN. supplier countries will have an advantage over others. The massive imports of rice that will flood the market could lead to a drastic drop in its price, forcing the government to cut costs even further and charge a cheaper price to local farmers who are already living below their means so that they have of capital to use. another planting process for the next harvest season and also make ends meet from their losses. If this continues, it could wipe out the local rice industry, potentially making the difficult situation permanent instead of a short-term solution to the long-term problem. Conclusion Better implementation of the TRI of RA 11203 and a priority given to the main role of the National Food Authority, in the development of the local rice industry, instead of providing a short-term solution to a :
Navigation
« Prev
1
2
3
4
5
Next »
Get In Touch