This essay will examine the differences between erotic art and pornography, discussing different philosophical viewpoints such as Scruton to conclude on whether Erotic art and pornography are separated and to what extent. Erotic art and pornography involve nudity and sexual desire to some extent. However, both have different goals and objectives, which makes them distinct, which will be discussed in this essay. Erotic art aims to aesthetically please its viewer, while pornography aims to sexually please its viewer. This means that erotic art can be considered beautiful and visually satisfying, whereas pornography has no beauty and is simply accessed to produce sexual arousal. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an Original EssayThe main difference that determines what is erotic art and what is pornography is that pornography appeals to our physical needs for sexual desire and aims to arouse sexual desire. public whereas erotic art is more aesthetic and more subjective to the audience, possibly provoking a range of emotions from pleasure to curiosity. Pornography has a simple goal: to arouse sexual desire, while erotic art represents this sexual desire with more meaning and focusing more on aspects such as the beauty of the human form or age. Pornography largely involves physical attraction between the individuals involved and the viewer, which is used alongside the fantasy presented to the viewer to stimulate sexual desire and provoke thoughts of sexual intent. Erotic art, however, does not share this primary focus and instead uses detail to distract from fundamental physical attraction and draw more attention to the interesting ways in which sexual desire can be depicted, sparking thoughts of interest and originality. stimulate a sexual response to some extent, but this is limited compared to pornography because the audience can only obtain this response through imagination, their own personal experiences and emotions. This restricts arousal when desire is imagined whereas, in pornography, arousal is the goal and sexual acts are performed with the intention of arousal. The distinguishing factor of erotic art using primarily the audience's imagination and pornography requiring very little imagination is significant because it adds to the fact that erotic art is more subjective to the viewer and can be viewed from a much more innocent way than pornography. Pornography can lead its viewer into a fantasy that requires little thought and requires no imagination. Pornography achieves this by presenting us with “the object of desire rather than its symbol.” This allows sexual desire to be satisfied before the viewer can enjoy it, as their thoughts are directed by what they are looking at instead of being allowed to marvel. Kant's theory of selfless pleasure states that pleasure in the beauty of art does not produce desire from sexual desire. spectator because we “take pleasure in something because we judge it to be beautiful, rather than judging it to be beautiful because we find it pleasant”. This confirms that erotic art and pornography can be distinguished because art does not produce sexual desire unlike pornography. The audience for erotic art will enjoy it because it is beautiful, while the audience for pornography will find pornography pleasurable and therefore will be deceived into calling it beautiful. Healso states that selfless pleasure is not associated with social norms because it does not involve reality. This shows how erotic art has a more artistic design that is aesthetically pleasing compared to pornography's lack of sophistication and effort to make sexual desire interesting or meaningful. Kenneth Clark, an art historian, states that the nude is not the subject of art, but a form of art. This means that instead of being simply depicted in the image, it is not directly depicted, making it more of a proposition than a direct representation. Clark believes that for erotic art to be aesthetically pleasing, it must be designed rather than described. This allows for an idealization of the human body, making it less realistic than pornography which has the sole purpose of arousing, and allowing for different goals such as arousing interest in the artwork or producing feelings of empathy. Clark also distinguishes between the nude and the nude, which is closely related to the distinction between erotic art and pornography. Clark is referring to the way we associate the word naked with guilt and embarrassment and view it as a shameful word not to think about. Societal norms portray nudity as dishonorable and encourage people to have little respect for nudity. The word naked, for its part, is associated with a state of beauty, grace and well-being. When the word nude is used, it is usually associated with purity and art. Those who are naked can stand with confidence, while those who are naked stand in humiliation. This conveys the difference between erotic art and pornography, as those depicted in erotic art are considered nude and those depicted in pornography are considered nude. Roger Scruton believes that pornographic art does not exist. He believes that pornography is incapable of beauty because of its focus on arousal, whereas art can be erotic and beautiful because it involves the viewer's imagination rather than their sexual fantasy. Erotic art allows the viewer's imagination to expand and involve their own personal thoughts and experiences with the artwork, while pornography tells the viewer what the fantasy is and leaves no room to the imagination when it is staged for him. Scruton distinguishes erotic art and pornography by their intentions. Erotic art evokes the pleasure of the imagination, while pornography arouses the pleasure of sexual desire. Scruton believes that erotic art is the meeting of human beauty with artistic beauty, meaning that it is aesthetic and produces an interested response from the viewer of the human form. This distinguishes it from pornography which manipulates human beauty to stimulate a sexual response. Scruton discusses the difference between animals and humans, as animals have drives and needs, while humans have Eros and choices. This is important when considering erotic art as distinct from pornography, because it explains how humans can enjoy sexual desire without needing to engage in it. Human beings have an individuality that allows for the subjectivity of erotic art, as each individual will think and feel differently when viewing it. Pornography, however, is universal and every individual will feel the same sexual desire while watching it. This shows that erotic art and pornography can be distinguished because erotic art is personal to each viewer and can elicit different emotions, thoughts and experiences depending on the complexity of the art and the different goals each artist decides to achieve. 'use and pornography is more conventional. provoking the same response from each audience with eachelement of pornography. Another thing that distinguishes erotic art from pornography is the objectification of the female form in pornography, as no interest is evoked by the face and it is simply seen as another part of the body, whereas in erotic art, importance is given to faces and they are able to evoke thought and wonder in their viewers apart from sexual desire. Scruton compares two artists, Titan and Boucher, analyzing faces in their erotic art. In Titan, “the face individualizes the body, possesses it in the name of freedom and condemns any greedy gaze as a violation. The Naked Titan does not provoke or excite, but maintains a detached serenity – the serenity of a person whose thoughts and desires are not ours but his. Scruton approves that Titan's erotic art serves the purpose of arousing interest and providing meaning that pornography does not have. Instead of producing sexual desire, Titan's erotic art provokes thought and curiosity about the painted individuals, which successfully distinguishes them as erotic art and not pornography. However, “Boucher’s nudes are not individualized by their faces. In fact, they all have the same face, which is not a face at all, but an assembly of parts. Lips slightly parted as if in anticipation of a kiss; clear eyes under lowered eyelashes; the oval contours filled with red cheeks that billow like sails in a summer breeze – all these features, brilliantly displayed from every angle and in every light, carry a single meaning, which is that of sexual appetite. Scruton disapproves of Boucher's erotic art because less attention is paid to the context of the painting and more attention is paid to femininity and desirability by having the same mediocre female role in each painting, making sexualization easier paintings with less focus. on the same face and more on the body, transforming it into a more pornographic painting. Modern erotic art can be considered more difficult to distinguish from pornography since the birth of the nude selfie. The controversy over whether nude selfie is erotic art or pornography is evident as an article talks about the artistic way Kim Kardashian captured her naked and pregnant body as she shows off the beauty of pregnancy . Another article explains that Kardashian's nude selfies cannot be considered pornographic because her expression and composition do not evoke arousal but evoke humor and the empowerment of women to be confident in their bodies without sexualizing it. However, another article talks about the pornographic nature of it. The article states that Kim Kardashian is self-objectifying through this nude selfie and attacks the idea that it can be constituted as art, calling it selfish and without creativity to produce any thought or imagination. Although there is controversy surrounding the distinction between modern erotic art and pornography, the main factors that make erotic art not pornographic remain the same, but can be subjective to the viewer. The nude selfie may be classified as erotic art if it does not have the pornographic intention of producing sexual arousal and is instead intended to be visually pleasing and thought-provoking. Individuals may classify a piece of erotic art as pornography due to their own sexual desires, but this only highlights the artistic nature of erotic art, as it has caused the viewer's imagination to expand and to be interested in art, while pornography forces sexual desire. on the viewer and paints the picture for him so that he does not use his imagination. Keep..