'Hotel Rwanda' is a film released in 2004, showing the events of the 1994 Rwandan genocide as seen by the hotel manager, Paul Rusesabagina. Roméo Dallaire, head of the United Nations Mission in Rwanda, criticizes the way the film depicts the genocide and the accuracy of the events. He criticized the way the filmmaker could “produce smut like that” and believed that his “only value” was “keeping the Rwandan genocide alive.” Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay. Dallaire lived through the genocide and fully understands the brutality involved. This is one of his criticisms because in the film “the story is biased”. The film does not capture the extreme violence and brutality of the genocide, as an anonymous woman who survived the genocide recalls that "100 or more men raped me." The film undermines horrors like this because it's only rated "PG-13" to increase viewership for more money rather than historical accuracy. The film also only shows Rusesabagina's perspective of the events and does not include the perspectives of the victims of the genocide which could have provided a better understanding of what actually happened, which would have increased accuracy history of the film. of Rusesabagina faced serious criticism from genocide survivors who were in the hotel in 1994, claiming that Rusesabagina was not helping the Tutsis out of kindness but for his own financial gain, because Mwenenganucye, who was the receptionist of the hotel, “accused Rusesabagina of having evicted refugees who failed to pay their bills”. Another account from survivor Kayihura recalls that Rusesabagina did not care or want the refugees in his hotel because "Rusesabagina had made a written request with the UN peacekeepers to expel the Tutsi refugees from the hotel” and “Under Rusesabagina, only those who had money could go to the hotel restaurant and buy food.” These accounts support Dallaire's opinion that the film is historically inaccurate and show the inaccuracy of Hotel Rwanda's portrayal of Paul Rusesabagina that he is not heroic and only wanted money from Tutsis looking for money. help in case of crisis. This means that the audience does not receive an accurate account of the genocide or what happened in the hotel from the film. Despite its criticism, Hotel Rwanda is historically accurate in some respects, as although the numbers were exaggerated, there were 1,200 people housed in the film. hotel, there were many people whose lives were saved by taking refuge in the hotel from the militia. Although the film does not capture the same brutality as the genocide itself, for example the use of machete to kill people, it gives the viewer a clear idea of ​​the massacre that took place when Rusesabagina fell from the van on the floor. Corpses pile up in the fog, which corresponds to the photos taken at the time of the genocide to represent the 800,000 people who died. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized paper now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay To conclude, the film does not really show the dark tone of the genocide as it only shows the dead bodies instead of how innocent people were brutally killed. Additionally, the film does not show how the survivors felt or their thoughts about the genocide, as the film only focuses on Rusesabagina's view of the events. The film is also widely criticized for its historical inaccuracy, which is why, (2014)