blog




  • Essay / Analysis of the use of persuasive methods by Noam Chomsky

    Noam Chomsky is an American linguist, social critic, and political activist; he is also a professor at MIT and has written numerous books on different subjects which he masters; according to Wikipedia. The context of Chomsky's argument is the world and specifically the United States. The same goes for the public when they speak and complain to the world and the United States. He complains about how we humans run the world through politics and the stupid actions we take. As he puts it, “human intelligence has created a perfect storm. If it continues to rage, the human experiment is unlikely to survive for very long.” Chomsky's argument focuses on moral responsibility, contrasting histories, and the central question: Is intelligence mortal? These three main topics are relevant in the argument because it delves deeper into each topic. There are three methods of persuasion that Chomsky uses in his argument to persuade his audience and these three strategies are ethos, pathos, and logos. He persuades his audience that citizens in their country are morally reasonable in their actions and efforts for their own government, which may be great or terrible depending on the citizen; and this is the main topic of this argument which he supported with evidence and logic which logos, he also provided emotions so that he can make you feel how he feels about the situation and that is called pathos, the last is ethos which It is a question of ethics and credibility of the author in the argument. These persuasive methods are important to Chomsky because he is trying to convey a message through this argument. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Starting with Chomsky's argument about moral responsibility is really important because there can be people who do good actions and are responsible, or there can be people who constitute a bad action that affects the world in a negative way. Chomsky discusses how humans created nuclear weapons and ICBMs and use these weapons against each other on our planet: "The end of World War II was one of the most important moments in history. history of humanity. It was a time of joy, but also of horror, with the dawn of the nuclear age, an era overshadowed by the grim realization that human intelligence had created the means of terminal destruction.” He mentions that the United States has done nothing to control what could be the destruction of humanity through nuclear war that could occur because of all the nuclear weapons and ICBMs we have created; is it like we are digging our own grave. Chomsky mentions climate change in the argument that, again, humans caused this problem and it led to uncontrollable and irreversible climate change, where he says: "The reasons in 2015-2016 were the growing threat of nuclear war and the inability to deal with climate change. , which had not been considered before. Returning to Chomsky's question that "it is better to be smart than to be stupid" and that being smart can be a deadly mutation; he mentions the word deadly which is said to be deadly, this shows fear in the author as well as worry and is trying to express himself and let the world know. The United States and Russia had a huge relationship according to Chomsky, where the United States has a foreign policy to keep Americans safe, but these have the opposite action and.