In this essay, I will discuss gun control in America and my position on the issue of its regulation. I want to start by saying that gun death is out of control and it is ridiculous how easy it seems for anyone to own a gun these days, regardless of age. For example, there was a report on the news about a 15 year old boy bringing a gun to the school he attended and when asked how he got the gun, he replied that he bought it from someone on the street. . I think there should be stricter rules on who should own guns and how they are sold, because the mortality rate of people who die from gun-related incidents needs to go down. Gun control should be subject to stricter rules because gun violence affects communities, lives and school safety. While many people around the world believe that the Second Amendment, "the right to keep and bear arms," ​​provides security and self-protection, I believe that gun ownership results in deaths, affected lives and lifelong injuries. Say no to plagiarism. . Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayViolence is everywhere in the world. In every country, city and village there is some form of violence. Throughout my life, there have been large numbers of deaths and serious injuries due to gun violence. We live in a country where gun violence is among the most prevalent in the world: the United States of America. Today, gun control and gun violence have become a controversial issue in the United States. The issue of gun control has been debated for a long time, probably since their inception. This is a small, but extremely dangerous factor in our lives. Gun rights could be both beneficial and problematic. Gun violence is violence committed with the use of a firearm (firearm or light weapon). Gun control, by definition, is the regulation of the sale and use of firearms. Gun control is important because it was created to reduce gun violence and deaths. Gun violence affects communities, lives and school safety. My thoughts on gun control are that the laws should be stricter, because guns are obviously very dangerous. Too many people lose their lives because of them, their families are seriously affected and they carry this loss with them forever. First, gun control should be subject to stricter rules because people owning guns leads to death. Hundreds of Americans are killed by guns every day and many more are injured by gunfire. In 2016, there were more than 38,000 gun-related deaths in the United States. In 2017, there were 40,000 gun-related deaths in the United States, making it the highest number of gun deaths in decades. 2018 was a particularly bad year for schools, as there were approximately 94 gun-related disturbances. There have been so many incidents involving firearms in recent years that I get dizzy when I think about how many of these incidents could have been avoided if gun control laws were stricter . I know some people buy guns for protection and I firmly believe that should be the only reason people would use a gun, but it's not the only reason and that's sad. What I wantWhat I mean by this is that many people buy guns to deliberately hurt other people for many unhealthy reasons. For example, people might shoot someone out of revenge, hatred, obsessive feelings or jealousy, etc. Second, gun control should be stricter because it affects the lives of many people. When a person's life is taken away, their family faces loss. Their family will be going through a very difficult time because it was so unexpected and they will be even more heartbroken that they didn't get the chance to say goodbye or give one last warm hug to the person they loved. they lost before they left. Losing someone you love is like losing a part of yourself that you will never truly get back. It is one of the worst things a person can experience in their life and even though at some point it becomes easier to understand this loss, there will always be a void that cannot be filled. When I think about how a life could be taken with a single bullet from a gun, I wonder how anyone could be so heartless and if gun control laws were stricter , could this prevent innocent people from losing their lives much less? gun control should be stricter because it leads to lifelong injuries. There are people who have been hit by a gun and who were lucky to escape, but who were seriously injured. Despite all the gun-related deaths, guns cause many more injuries each year. Sometimes when people are hit by a gun, they can be seriously injured or even paralyzed. For example, gunshot wounds can result in limb loss, body disfigurement, severe bleeding, tissue and organ damage, fractures, wound infections, and paralysis. Such injuries could leave a person very depressed and sad, which could lead them to want to commit suicide. Utilitarianism is the doctrine that an action is right to the extent that it promotes happiness and that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the guide. principle of conduct. Utilities answer the following three questions: What is good? That is, pleasure, what is right? That is, actions that promote the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people, and what is right? What laws promote the greatest good for the greatest number? Utilitarians believe that the right thing to do is to produce as much happiness as possible, while the wrong thing to do is just the opposite, causing unhappiness or the least amount of good for the greatest number of people. I would argue that guns do more harm to the majority than good to the majority. They would say that gun ownership shouldn't even be allowed and that they should be banned for good. Guns are a means of harming others and whether it is for self-defense or for selfish purposes, such as killing someone out of hatred, it is wrong. Life is precious and you only have one, so taking away a life does not promote any kind of happiness. Utilitarians would say that gun control laws are unfair because they don't stop most bad things from happening, which ultimately don't cause much happiness. Virtue ethics is person-based rather than action-based. It is about the moral character of the person who performs an action. The virtue ethicist asks the following questions: Am I a good person? Am I thriving? And am I living well? THE.