War films are often dramatized, whether in a positive political context. Some glorify it while others emphasize a depiction of the hardship caused and lives lost. Others shed a positive light on one side while dehumanizing or criticizing the other. The Childhood of Ivan and the Battle of Algiers are neither. Ivan's Childhood, unequivocally an anti-war film, features a young, newly orphaned boy who joins the Soviet army to avenge the loss of his parents. The Battle of Algiers is not as directly anti-war. It is a complex and realistic depiction of the aim of the war and the losses it caused. Where the two films converge is the divergence that the respective war has caused from the ordinary, more pleasant state. In Ivan's childhood, Ivan's childhood is effectively stolen from him by war. In The Battle of Algiers, the Casbah and the innocence of women are corrupted by the war. Both The Battle of Algiers and Ivan Childhood argue that people have legitimate reasons to engage in war, with war ultimately being portrayed as a disruption of people's natural, more pleasant state. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayIvan Bondarev is a young Russian boy who wants to avenge the death of his parents. Through a series of dream sequences, it becomes apparent that his mother and father were killed by German soldiers. to do this, he joins the partisans and demands to fight on the front line. Ivan is steadfast, even stubborn and rude in achieving his goals, but his intentions are portrayed in a positive light. Since the viewer sympathizes with Ivan, through a heartbreaking story, whatever it may be. In the end, the viewer gets what he would like to see, as Ivan is accepted as a soldier and succeeds in his reconnaissance missions. In short, his enterprise is a success, and the viewer's sympathy for Ivan legitimizes his intentions to want to fight in the war, especially against an enemy as loathsome as the Germans of World War II. In the eyes of the filmmakers, fighting in this particular war is a worthy endeavor. In this sense, Ivan's Childhood is not an anti-war film. Despite the way Ivan is portrayed, his life as a soldier is literally shown in a dark light. It all happens at night and we never see Ivan smile or act playfully. He looks older than his years and does his best to bond with the rest of the followers. However, during all of Ivan's dreams, we see him smiling, running and prancing playfully, interacting with his friends. In his dreams, Ivan is a normal child. these dreams contrast sharply with his life as a soldier. From the lack of light to his body language and facial expressions, it is evident how different his life at war is from his life with his mother, father, and friends. A great example of this contrast is the dream in which Ivan is shirtless. a forest next to a dirt road. The sun shines, lighting up her blonde hair. Ivan looks at a butterfly, a goat and seems to search the surroundings in a cruel and playful manner. He floats in the air, smiling and brushing the tree branches away from his face. After he smiles and stops to lean over to get a glass of water, the dream stops, as Ivan wakes up in a small, dark hut, looking surprised. This sudden awakening is an illustration of the loss of his childhood. This joyful and playful scene is interrupted by the harsh reality of war. He no longer has a mother and his choice to join the Soviet army deprives Ivan of idyllic days like.