Although the “notion of genius” can be defined as many things in various ways, two of the most influential artists of the Renaissance, Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo -Angel of Lodovico Buonarroti Simoni, are still well recognized as the genius of art today. Leonardo, known worldwide for his masterpieces “The Last Supper” and “The Mona Lisa,” and Michelangelo, also known for his work “The David Sculpture,” share some similarities. Behind their historic works, it is evident that their natural talent, attractive structure, and a difference in painting style related to their subject preferences played a major role in the popularity and fame of these artists. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original EssayNatural talent, which includes acute sensitivity, is one of the important factors when it comes to something that has no rules like art. It is obvious that Leonardo da Vinci had a transcendent artistic talent from a young age. After his father discovered his artistic talent, he was apprenticed to a well-known artist around the age of 15. The fact that he never received a basic formal education but was transcended to train in the mechanical arts in Andrea's workshop clearly shows how very talented he already was, even before receiving special training in art. It was even claimed that her angel drawn on the panel Andrea was working on was more beautiful than hers. Furthermore, it was stated that he had an estimated IQ of 200 and had shown talent in various fields outside of art, as a mathematician, inventor, and natural sciences. Among all, natural science is another essential principle of his life which cannot be ignored, as he implemented a logical approach to solve the problems of daily life. His achievements in studies outside of art earned him the nickname "Uomo Universale," according to Devoldere. It can perhaps be said that his discoveries in sciences such as neuroanatomy and neurophysiology played a major role in the modern development of historical science. On the other hand, it seems likely that Michelangelo's talent flourished when he was surrounded by an environment with countless stone quarries. Although his father did not appreciate his desire to become an artist, his talent was soon appreciated by many patrons and citizens of Florence. The fact that he was commissioned to carry out historical works for Pope Julius II which concluded his independent tomb clearly shows that his talent stood out from others and was unique (Krén and Marx). Like Leonardo, he also had an extremely high IQ, estimated at 177, which also allowed him to study in other fields such as politics and philosophy. However, it is clear that they both also enjoyed study outside of art in order to create their masterpieces, which can perhaps be supported by Michelangelo's quote: " Genius is eternal patience.” How a work of art attracts people's attention. and attracting the public cannot generally be explained by studies and scientific evidence, because each individual has their sensitivity. However, it was evident that their masterpieces shared some similarities in structure and design, although it remains unclear whether they intentionally implemented them or not. It is the use of the golden ratio, the divine proportion by another name, that helps art to be structured in the “most aesthetic way,” according to Esaak. Leonardo implemented this ratio in several of his tables ofworld famous such as “The Mona Lisa” and “The Last Supper”. The fact that each of these two paintings is in the largest museum and church in the world and was exchanged for huge sums of money proves that people still see the special value of these paintings today.Michel -Angel however, it has been claimed that he also used the golden ratio for works such as "The Creation of Adam" and the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel (Meisner). Although the intention to deliberately use the report has not been proven, it can be predicted that this played a role in many audiences seeing significant value in it, given that the masterpieces created by these two artistic geniuses exhibit the characteristics of the golden ratio. Despite the similar characteristics in their works that they share, discussed above, and the fact that they are both known as geniuses, they certainly have a difference that can be seen from the previous works created by Leonardo and Michel -Angel. The first difference is their strengths in art. It is evident that Leonardo passionately drew women in his paintings and left works such as "The Lady with an Ermine", "Mona Lisa" and "Leda and the Swan" according to Jones. The female figures painted by Leonardo in the "Lady with an Ermine" were soft and glamorous, which even gives the impression that the airbrush technique was used to paint, although it did not exist at the time where the painting was finished. On the other hand, Michelangelo is known for his works that involve men or men as female models, such as "The Sculpture of David", "The Last Judgment", and "Leda and the Swan". Although Michelangelo later painted the same picture as Leonardo on a decay, the completed work of art was entirely different. As Michelangelo was better at painting figures of men, it is evident that he used male models to paint figures of women, which has been described as "transgender images", according to Garrard (quoted in Even ). Arguably, this gave his paintings of women a more musicalized appearance and as a result. However, it is evident that his “David sculpture” has attracted people for centuries with the remarkable beauty of his figure depicting strength and youth. Although Leonardo and Michelangelo are often listed together as art geniuses representing the Italian Renaissance, it is clear that they were two completely different artists who had an almost opposite style of painting. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay The definition of genius may differ among individuals and may be overgeneralized. However, the two most influential and well-known art geniuses of the Italian Renaissance expressed strong characters in every work of art they created during their lives. It is evident that their natural talent which covered a wide range of subjects other than art, the use of the most attractive ratio structure and their opposite characters made their pieces unique and their genius of art which is transmitted still today. Their artwork has greatly influenced our modern lives and makes our generation curious about who will be recognized as a genius in the future. Works Cited Gary Meisner, “Michelangelo and the Art of the Golden Ratio in Design and Composition,” 01/18/2016, Web. 01/08/2019 “Three characteristics of Renaissance arts and four innovations”, 10/15/2019, Web. 01/08/2019, “Activity: golden ratio using the golden ratio”, Museum of Science, web. 1/8/2019Louie Andre, “13 smartest people in the history of the world”, Finances en ligne, Web. 8/01/2019 «. 1/8/2019