blog




  • Essay / Critique of Henry Fayol's Functional Approach to...

    Mintzberg and Fayol agree that all goals begin with planning. Fayol's planning function is undeniable because it is common that all managers must do beforehand to build a successful course. Of the ten roles stated by Mintzberg, there are five that have a similar meaning to that of Fayol's planning function. Furthermore, in his “folk” article, Mintzberg mentioned that every manager has to devote a huge amount of time to deal with strong disruption pressure. (Mintzberg, 1975) For example, most of the time, managers are not only focused on his personal papers, but he also has to deal with unexpected phone calls and sometimes also subordinates who come into his room to chat. Managers therefore have an obligation to act as disruption managers. However, Mintzberg's statements sound a bit like Fayol's control and coordination function. Apart from this, Mintzberg also cannot completely deny the existence of an organizing function in management. Most theorists have recognized the importance of organization and defined it as a crucial element in managing an organization. Among the 10 roles suggested by Mintzberg, those of leader and resource allocator are the strongest evidence that Mintzberg also accepted Fayol's organization.