Table of ContentsIntroductionUndermining the Essence of CharityImpact of Charity on Academics ConclusionWorks CitedIntroductionIn a New York Times Weekly by Randy Cohen, he talks about the right and wrong of teachers offering extra credit for charitable work, which shows that teachers view charity as a selfish act, which is unethical. The urge to want those extra credit points from students allows them to miss the essence of what charitable projects really are: the importance of charity. This situation also affects the way students learn, leading them to prioritize personal gain over true altruism.Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original EssayUndermining the Essence of CharityWhen you do charitable work or help people in need, it has to be truly authentic. You need to understand why you are doing it and who you are doing it for. When one is influenced by extra credits or bonus points, it takes away that feeling of being real with oneself. Manipulating students with extra points is not a way to motivate them to help the community, but it does create ways in which they could only help themselves. Encouraging students to participate in social activities is a good thing, but there must be a "distinction between classroom activities and outside activities" (Cohen 1), because if this boundary is not visible, students will will easily be taken for granted. Without this diving line, teachers are deliberately setting their students up for failure. Either way, giving a student extra credit for doing things outside of school grounds discourages them from doing their best on their homework. The main purpose of extra credit is to enable students to complete additional work related to academic subjects. This requires that students cannot earn extra points by participating in one or more charitable events that have "nothing to do with a student's mastery of a certain subject" (Riskey 2). “Student grades are intended to assess a student's academic success, not to stimulate social activism, however valuable that may be” (Cohen 1). Unnecessarily adding extra credit points will counter the original assignment grade which will misinterpret the student's overall academic standing, which "is a bad policy, not because it sends a bad message about charity, but it sends the wrong message about math or chemistry or AP English” (Chohen1). Charity's Impact on Academics By awarding unnecessary extra credit points, students and parents misinterpret academic strengths. This shows that there should be a limit to the number of additional credits a student earns. Avoidable bonus points that are distributed frequently could lead to inequity in the gradebook. When students are given the opportunity to earn extra credit without academic learning, they tend to accept it even though it may mean that a student would pass without gaining any knowledge or even meeting all of the criteria for the assignment or chapter specific. We tend to see students taking the easy way out, which will get them nowhere. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a personalized essay Conclusion: granting for most.