This essay will primarily discuss the film "Pride", directed by Matthew Warchus, through Marxism and the theory of Marx on alienation. There is an emphasis on alienation theory throughout the film, with an introduction to Marxism. Although Marxist theory is about the concept of capitalism in a society as a nation as a whole, and the effects it has on the lower classes, called the "working class", this film is much more about alienation and how this lower class feels alienated by the way the government treats them and how they must oppose it and come together to overcome everything and achieve their goal. Where the LGSM group is linked by the same cause that they share, they have all set a goal that they want to achieve and they will not stop until it is achieved. Of course, there are many films that perfectly represent the Marxist theory of capitalism and social commercialism, but this film is an excellent representation of capitalism and the influence it has on society by creating the alienation that Marx speaks of . Marx's theory of alienation was used as a tool for freedom for workers and the fight against capitalism and the wages given to them, and also as a source for being happier in the work environment, which at the same time The era was destroyed by capitalist regimes. to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on 'Why violent video games should not be banned'?Get an original essayCritical analysis of Marx's theory of alienation in the film 'Pride'During the British miners' strike of 1984-85, an unexpected ally showed support for the miners. The strike had been led by Mark Ashton (Ben Schnetzer), who, with the support of Lesbian and Gays Support the Miners (LGSM), launched the strike by collecting money to help union workers. Mark and his friends held buckets and chanted the name of their organization, outside the bookstore, "Gay is the word," while some donated at least something that others spat at them. After all these humiliating situations, Mark takes charge and encourages his friends to continue their organization, because the only people who were treated worse by the British newspapers than homosexuals were the miners. “If anyone knows what this treatment is like,” Mark says, “it’s us.” (Walters nd) As a side note, there are other themes that appear in the film, such as: One is dedicated to the women-only splinter group, the lesbians. Against well closures; the growing awareness of HIV and AIDS is another common thread, with Mark confronted with an infected and dying ex-lover, while he distances himself from others because he suspects he is also infected ; Joe's growing involvement in the activist group and his coming out which led him to leave home and sever ties with his parents and family; Siân becomes more aware of her own talents and realizes with Jonathan's help that she can be more than just a mother and housewife; hostility towards the gay community "Gay's the Word" is the target of vandalism on several occasions. But the most important message of this film is that meeting someone of a different race, gender, orientation or status is much more informative, honest and enriching than meeting them from the sanctuary sure of a representation on a TV or a description on a favorite website. In doing so, everyone can make a difference to themselves and the world at large. We are not that different from each other and we couldget all the help you can get. Or as they say in the movie “Solidarity Forever,” or should I say, sing it through solidarity songs (Billy Bragg’s powerful rendition of There Is Power in a Union). Karl Marx's hypothesis of alienation depicts the antagonism of individuals from certain parts of their species-substance as a result of living in a large public of overlapping social classes. Separation from self is the result of being a careless member of a social class, whose condition disturbs a man from his humanity. For Marx, the historical context of humanity had a dual point of view: it was a context marked by increasing human control. on nature at the same time, because it was a past filled with increasing distance from man. Distance could be described as a condition in which men are overwhelmed by forces of their own creation, which are arrayed against them as external forces. This thought is vital to most of Marx's earlier philosophical compositions and continues to guide his later works, although it is no longer a philosophical question, but a social marvel. The Marx asks: “Under what conditions do men extend their own special powers, their own special esteem, to things beyond their control? What are the social reasons for this marvel? it's about finding other individuals just like them and being distanced from each other. In fact, even Marx recognizes that people are social creatures. Throughout history, to ensure unique survival, social orders have formed into groups that have unique and essential connections to the methods of creation. We can now look at the LGSM group as one class (the working class) and society (the societal group) and differentiate between the two. One is always in the stands and the other is the winning side. Now we can understand why the LGSM group did what they did, because not too long ago they were beaten up by the cops and slammed by the press, as Mark said in the movie “It wasn't that long ago that we were on this side. They are like us.” No one should be allowed to do this to other people, as shown in a film where a short interview with Margaret Thatcher is shown and the journalist asks her why she doesn't reconsider the way she acts against minors, and she replies "I'm not in a position to be a softie, I'm in a kind of job where that's not acceptable." That's why a character like Mark was the backbone of this film with his encouragement and leadership. Mark says that even though we don't have money, we have a lot of spirit and will and if we can support our fight with money, we certainly can, with our spirit and will. This is important because Marx said this: “In a capitalist world, our means of survival is based on monetary exchange, so we have no choice but to sell our labor power and, therefore, to 'be linked to the demands of the capitalist. [The worker] "Does not feel content but unhappy, does not freely develop his physical and mental energy but mortifies his body and ruins his spirit. The worker therefore only feels outside his work, and in his work he feels beside himself. “Work is external to the worker”, it is not part of his essential being. During work, the worker is miserable, unhappy and drained of energy, the work "mortifies his body and ruins his spirit." The content, direction and form of production are imposed by the entrepreneur. The worker is controlled and told what to do, since he does not have the meansproduction, he has no say in production, "work is external to the worker, that is, it does not belong to his essential being. The mind of a person should be free and conscious, but controlled and directed by the capitalist, "the external character of work for the worker appears in the fact that it is not his own but that of others, that it does not belong to him , that he belongs there, not to himself, but to another” (18Ma). workflow have their place in another person Currently, we really do not recognize what the LGSM aggregate improves the situation lives, other than Gethin and Jonathan who run the bookstore, so we can affirm that the framework related to the. money is not essential to “our survival”. The dubious use of Marx's distance hypothesis is part of an investigation into different exercises outside the circle of work, which we attempt by decision. rather than out of necessity. The more hostile, exhausting and miserable the world of work appears to us, the more people devote their energy to their lives outside of work. Perhaps this is why they try so hard to fight against society and help themselves as much as the miners did for the community. The miners are also happy with what they are doing, Cliff (Bill Nighy) gives a wonderful speech about the mines and says that without them there would be no country and that these mines are miners and vice versa. Throughout the film he shows his pride in being a minor, and it has nothing to do with the fact that Clif is also gay, like all the other minors, they consider it their family heritage and they say it with pride . When they hold their meetings, many miners from other towns participate as a whole community because they represent a group of people and it would not be an exaggeration to say that they represent a social class apart. However, with regard to the alienation of the worker in relation to other workers, Marx sees things in another light: the arrangement of production relations in the capitalist economy causes a social conflict by pitting worker against worker, in a competition for “higher wages”, thus distancing them from their mutual economic relations. interests; the result is a false consciousness, which is a form of control exercised by the capitalist bourgeoisie through its cultural hegemony. Furthermore, in the capitalist mode of production, the philosophical collusion of religion in the justification of relations of production facilitates the awareness, then aggravates, the alienation (Entfremdung) of the worker in relation to his humanity; it is a socio-economic role independent of religion which is “the opiate of the masses”. Throughout the film we see people from all over the UK fighting for a similar reason, with no distinction between them. People are not intrigued by religion, age, government issues, gender, etc., as long as you come to fight them for that reason. This is seen at the beginning of the film where Mike hands the pennant to Joe without knowing him, revealing to us that he came here to walk and make the wisest decision. We also see that the older people have changed their way of understanding, Gwen forms a strong relationship with “her lesbians” and promises them that she will do much more for herself as a woman. Many things and people have changed because of this group of activists and this is a fact because this film was made based on a true story, although not everything was depicted in the film, but its main points are there. Now, as Hegel and Marx indicated, the term alienation designates.