“Lamb to Slaughter” by Roald Dahl and “A Jury of Her Peers” by Susan Glaspell are stories about two female murderers, Mary Maloney and Mrs. Wright (Minnie Foster), who murder their husbands under different circumstances. While both women and guilty, the authors manage to present them as "worshipful and frightened wives" in the stories. The exhibition returns the elusive to justice which defends them against their respective murders under the pretext of the misdeeds of a patriarchal society. Mary and Mrs. Wright's characterization, settings, style, and circumstances are built around stereotypical gender roles and a skewed idea of ​​justice that make them elusive and present them as victims rather than homicidal maniacs. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Both women, Mary and Mrs. Wright, are confined by their patriarchal societies into domestic roles. Mary is a housewife who waits for her husband to arrive at 5 p.m. each work day, cooks for him, sits down to sew, and focuses on making her husband comfortable. Although she is heavily pregnant, Mary is still busy serving her husband, Patrick Maloney. Likewise, Mrs. Wright is a housekeeper and knitter, her husband. Mr. Wright is said to be difficult to get along with and violent. "Although she has often been characterized as disturbed and abused, there has been little speculation about the nature of her mental state or the types of abusive behavior she suffered in her marriage" (Glaspell). The examples of drudgery, abuse, and the submissive nature of women in the stories reveal their domesticity and male chauvinism. They were reduced to simple servants without the possibility of pursuing a professional career. The refusal of personal development is an issue that can be seen as a problem of sympathy to explain/justify their status as victims. Additionally, Mary and Mrs. Wright are able to become elusive to the male-dominated court/jury system. After hitting her husband with a frozen leg of lamb with the impact of a steel baton, Mary destroys all the evidence by convincing the investigator to eat the lamb, the murder weapon after an officer declared: "Take the gun, and you I have the man". Ultimately, the men are unable to gather the evidence because they destroy it themselves. In Susan Glaspell's story, Mr. Wright's murder is obvious; she is held under the assumption of being insane, with no evidence to prove the motive for Mrs. Wright's murder. She nevertheless leaves traces in her messy seams, her empty cage, and her remains. of birds that only the female investigators are able to recognize The women think that the male jury would laugh at the evidence and ignore it They also decide to save theirs by keeping the evidence secret. things on the surface and ignore essential details; this makes them overlook the guilt of female murderers. As a result, women are able to deceive the male-dominated legal system. Mary and Mrs. Wright contrast in their motivation to kill and in their idea of ​​justice. On the one hand, Mary kills her husband for asking for a divorce. She seems to have nothing to lose because she has already lost everything she had built with him to another woman “… She knew very well what the penalty would be. It was good. It made no difference to her.” Nevertheless, Mary feared that the death penalty would even affect her unborn child and cleaned up the evidence to bring justice to her innocent child. In.' 1917.