In recent years, the increasing number of concussions suffered by those under the age of 18 has simultaneously encouraged its controversy. However, as pediatrician Stephen M. Rothman argues, this is a movement formed under false pretenses because the injuries suffered by young people are in no way comparable to those suffered by longtime professional athletes who don't take security. necessary precautions to avoid further head trauma. Furthermore, the evolution of the very definition of a concussion has allowed this unnecessary reaction to continue. First, Rossman says the speed with which students are rushed into medical wards that arguably prevent them from some of the healthiest activities that people their age can participate in is unfortunate because of the overweight problem that still prevails in the country. Students are further encouraged to take unnecessary precautions due to insufficient standards evident at the professional level. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay For example, certain precautionary methods should be applied after a student suffers a concussion: “if the patient is still asymptomatic After two weeks she can return to normal play. But if an athlete suffers two concussions in a single season, she must sit out the remainder of the season and possibly return the following year. " (Rothman, p. 1) Ironically, parents react negatively to concussions, while professional concussions are never treated as they medically should be. Professionals are often told to return to the field as soon as possible, which could worsen their injuries and lead to chronic problems in their later years. As long as students take the necessary precautions by remaining inactive after their concussion to prove that their injuries are asymptomatic, everything should go as planned. concussions that children experience while playing sports in the short amount of time they have are completely on the opposite end of the spectrum from professionals who have suffered more serious injuries. This problem is compounded by the fact that the term. Concussion has had its own evolution over the years. In 1977, a concussion was understood as something suffered by a person who lost consciousness. However, in 2013 the term was used whenever any of the symptoms were experienced, such as "headache, amnesia, and sensitivity to light and sound, but not necessarily loss of consciousness." ” (Rothman, p. 1) In other words, the public reaction to the increase in concussions over the years is due to this change in definition. So while the number of concussions hasn't necessarily increased over time, it appears that they have. As a result, people worry more about a topic to an unnecessary degree. In conclusion, Rothman's article urging parents to worry less about their children's concussions is accurate. Since young athletes cannot be compared to experienced athletes due to the shorter playing time they have played and the more severe quality of their injuries, and also because the definition of a concussion has changed over the decades, it is stupid to perpetuate this frenzy. reaction. Instead, those involved should consider whether or not the impact of the blow resulted in serious trauma in..