-
Essay / US Involvement in an Organized Conspiracy
US Involvement in an Organized Conspiracy Was the Iraq War a means to improve national security or a conspiracy to seek personal gratification? On March 19, 2003, a war was waged under public scrutiny to destroy the Ba'athist regime led by Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. This pivotal moment in U.S. history marked the beginning of public concern about political corruption in our government as a means of expressing personal gratification. National security became the major concern in the United States after the tragic events of September 11, 2001. Many issues have been brought to public attention, such as why the September 11 attacks were not broadcast before the deaths of innocent Americans. Questions of this nature have focused on the al-Qaeda insurgency living in the United States and abroad, as primarily responsible for the September 11 attacks. These attacks on American soil revealed a direct correlation with the failure to report problems and the United States' unwillingness to resolve problems before they escalate. This tragic event has sparked widespread public, political and international concern aimed at strengthening security in and around our country to prevent future terrorist groups from causing death and destruction again. The main emphasis was on "waging the war on terrorism", a slogan that George Bush Jr. incorporated into his quest to eliminate terrorism around the world. Bush began his quest by declaring war on Afghanistan as part of a mission to kill Osama Bin Ladien, the leader of al-Qaeda, and those affiliated with al-Qaeda insurgents. Several years later, Bush decided to focus attention on Iraq. DiffusionThe initial focus on Iraq was directly related to its involvement in the initial phase of the war. These factors that justified the war in Iraq were the refusal to collaborate with UN inspectors and the harsh sanctions that the Iraqi government imposed on its citizens. The ignorance by which Saddam ruled was dictated throughout his country during the time he commanded the Iraqi government. In retrospect, Saddam's dictatorship imposed potential future national security problems. Although this possibility of a future crisis could have occurred, I believe that other diplomatic diplomacy could have prevented the war from occurring. Saving the lives of millions before the bombings and invasion. Interpreting this logically would have been the best way to deal with Saddam's ignorant decision. Concluding that the best way to solve this problem of injustice could have been avoided instead of invented from scratch..