Abortion remains a highly stigmatized topic, especially in a country as steeped in religion as the Philippines. I realized that, interestingly, many of those who oppose abortion are men – individuals who will not become pregnant and will not have to deal with the many problems and health concerns associated with pregnancy . I believe that women must be the first to debate abortion, whether they are for or against, because they are the most affected during a pregnancy. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The most common argument in favor of abortion is that a woman's body belongs to her and therefore she can do with it what she wants. I find this to be a very selfish argument, although understandable, and it completely ignores the fact that it is not only a woman who is affected, but also an unborn child. Scientifically speaking, life begins when an embryo is formed, and aborting a child is like killing someone, except that person didn't even get a chance to experience life. Society hates crimes in which another life is deliberately and seriously harmed, and especially crimes in which another life is killed, and so do I. However, even before reading this article, I have long been pro-choice. Not all reasons for abortion are humane – sometimes it is done because a couple does not want to live with an unplanned child. However, in some circumstances, an unborn child is a painful memory of a trauma or problem in the body that must be removed in order to live, such as an organ tumor. In these situations, abortion does not seem bad at all, but, regardless of the circumstances, it is still the deliberate taking of life. Despite this, I am convinced that when a minor is raped and impregnated by an adult, or when the woman's health becomes critical due to a problem that occurred during her pregnancy, abortion is the lesser of two evils. As a woman, I would not want to be in one of the two difficult situations mentioned above, and if I were, I would be emotionally distressed. I think if I were in either situation, I would always prioritize myself, including my mental health and/or my health, even if I have to consider another life. Is it selfish? Probably yes. However, if I did not choose abortion, my life would be tarnished for life or would no longer exist. It may seem that by choosing my life over that of my potential child, I think my life has more value, but I would just like to feel better about myself and continue to live a life without any associated pain or trauma. The reason can be justified, abortion always kills, and yet it suits me even if I am against other forms of murder. Sometimes I understand and even sympathize with those who had an abortion because they simply didn't want to have the child. This is relativism, and I know it is, but there are many gray areas around abortion and I can't help but sometimes feel sorry for those who have had it, especially those who needed it. There are reasons why I feel this way, not just because of the reasons why abortion should be implemented stated in the article. The first is the current stigmatization of abortion. People judge those who have had an abortion, even those who had to do so. Some believe that those who have had an abortion, regardless of the reason, have a complete disregard for human life. As we said.