To begin with, there are many social and economic issues occurring throughout the world today. For example, one of the issues would be gun control laws. Given that nearly a quarter of our country's population owns a gun, there are questions about whether or not gun control laws should be strengthened. This topic has multiple advantages and disadvantages. Two of the main arguments against strengthening gun control laws are one; laws created for gun control do not deter crime, and second; Laws created for gun control violate the human right to protect themselves. To be more precise, over a 29-year period when certain weapons were banned, the number of murders did not decrease. Instead, it stayed pretty much the same. On the other hand, states that had stricter gun control laws had more murders. These murders were all gun-related. Second, many people use guns for protection. In fact, firearm self-defense is used more than a million times a year. Since authorities cannot keep everyone safe 24/7, people confirmed that the more restrictions, the less they can keep themselves and others safe. On the other hand, two of the main arguments for strengthening gun control laws are: ; strengthening laws created for gun control would prevent gun deaths, and second; it would also ensure the safety of women in specific situations (domestic abusers). To get into specifics, many people will use a gun to harm themselves or others. In fact, in 14 years, more than 400,000 people have died from guns. Strict laws would prevent this from happening. Second, stricter gun laws can protect women from being killed by an attacker. With the presence of firearms during violent family disputes, the percentage of female victims reaches 500%. With stricter laws, women can be assured of their safety during violent conflicts. Overall, there are many positives and negatives to increasing gun control laws. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayNext, another problem that arises in society is the death penalty. In 19 years, more than 1,000 humans have been executed for their crimes. As people are executed, the question arises whether the death penalty should be allowed or not. This topic has multiple advantages and disadvantages. Two of the main arguments against allowing the death penalty are one; the action likely constitutes disobedience to the Torture Prohibition Act, and secondly; the death penalty would have no effect. To be more specific, Hussein said the execution methods can cause so much suffering that they can easily violate the country's human rights law and the ban on torture. By authorizing the death penalty, the State goes against the laws and acts it is supposed to respect. Then, it is said that the death penalty reduces certain crimes, among others, but that is not true. Studies have shown that the results of the death penalty do not stop or reduce the number of murders. The number of victims is still approximately the same...