The importance of theoretical frameworks for understanding the foundations of political scienceThe importance of theoretical frameworks is essential for understanding the foundations of political science. The definition of the word framework is a theory that can be used as a lens to examine a set of facts. (For example, a journalist examines a set of facts that tell the story of what happened). These political science frameworks help build a strong foundation and advocate for a clear sense of racial balance in the political arena. A social scientist attempts to organize a set of facts into a systemic theoretical passion. Social scientists attempt to ensure that the facts they create can be used to explain a theory that can be applied to other sets of facts. The importance of these frameworks helps people gather important information and compare their different strengths and weaknesses. The first and most dominant traditional framework to examine is pluralism. Pluralism can generally be defined as group politics in a free market society. Pluralism has its roots since the founding of the nation. James Madison viewed the United States as a nation stronger in conflict rather than consensus. Madison points out in Federalist #10 that citizens would be divided into many factions that would compete for benefits. The main cause of division when Madison wrote these lines was economic, but race has now become a major factor dividing American society. Robert Dali, founder of Pluralism, modernizes Madison's theory into the theory of American democracy to incorporate it into the theory of pluralism. Pluralism explains the politics of minority groups in a process that attempts to show the strength of minority groups. Under pluralism, the theory assumes that there are non-cumulative inequalities in American politics. These inequalities would mean that no group would be in the minority in a law passed each time and that no group would dominate each time either. The second part of the theory of pluralism suggests that there is a multiple center of power. A definition of multiple power center is when a minority group is denied access to influence over one branch of government, but may be able to influence policy or policy change in another part of the government. 'arena. For example, a group may be unable to pursue its goals of influencing the legislative branch, but it may be able to influence the executive branch. The third assumption of pluralist theory is that non-cumulative groups have a certain number of political resources. If a group does not have financial means, it can make up for it by showing up at the voting booth..