Table of contentsAdvantages of the uniformLimiting the impacts of gangsReducing peer pressureReducing clothing costsIncreasing academic resultsIncreasing students' self-esteemDisadvantages of the uniformViolation of the rights of the first amendmentDoes not deter violence and gang activitySocial classes among students will remainSchool uniforms are an economic burdenIntrusion into students' livesConclusionWorks CitedSchool uniforms have been a very controversial topic for a long time. While some believe that by introducing a school uniform policy we can solve many problems related to school education, others strongly oppose such policies, seeing them as limiting freedom of expression students. So the aim of this essay is to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of school uniforms. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayBenefits of UniformSchool uniforms promote equality among students. The rich and the poor wear the same uniform. This creates equality between the rich and the poor. Additionally, the school uniform shows the unique identity of the school. When a student wears a school uniform, he goes to school with a spirit of study. So, students pay more attention to their studies than their clothes. This reduces competition between students related to wearing fashionable outfits. Limiting the Impacts of Gangs Crowds have become a growing fear in our universities. These groups usually wear a certain color or emblem in order to differentiate themselves from each other. Sometimes non-gang students can't wear certain clothes or colors because they don't want to be confused with gang members. “Reports indicate that gang wearing of the clothing conveys messages of threat, intimidation, fear and defiance to rival gangs.” The study on gang activity in schools has not yet been proven, but "evidence shows that gang violence has increased, dropout rates have increased, and standardized test scores have decreased. It would be presumptuous to say that one causes the other, but there is a good chance that such a correlation exists. “Safety in our schools is a major concern. By introducing a school uniform policy, students' fear of attending a school populated by gangs could be reduced. Everyone would be dressed the same, so the distinction between crowds, as well as their activity, would be reduced. The learning process could therefore continue in a more positive atmosphere. Kilpatrick believes that if "repeated messages" don't work, students are simply forced to comply: "Sometimes coercion is necessary to form a habit." Reducing Peer Pressure Peer pressure exists in everyone and even more so if you are a teenager. . It is a part of human nature over which control is limited. The style and marketing industries, as well as other parts of the media in our culture, add to the peer pressure we all experience. Not only do students feel the pressure to conform, but so do parents. Students are forced to wear “casual” clothes in order to fit in with their higher class. Making a fashion statement is the way to be accepted and appreciated by your peers. Students relieve some of this pressure by pretending that their parents are buying them the latest dress trends. THEParents are put in a situation where they buy lavish clothes that quickly go out of style just so their child will be loved and/or not stressed out at school. . School clothing gives parents and students another tool of warfare against societal tensions and allows students to place less importance on fashionable dresses and more importance on a purposeful education. For students, this means more time to sleep in the morning because they wouldn't have to spend endless amounts of time figuring out what to wear to school. If this means more sleep, then students will be more careful to focus on their studies. “Uniforms also impose a valuable attitude that people have to be judged on their personality and not their appearance. Decreasing Clothing Costs In the past, parents would spend large sums of money every August to buy head-to-toe school dresses for their teenagers. Currently, “the International Mass Retail Association (IMRA) surveyed its members – stores such as Walmart, Kmart and Burlington Coat Factory – and found that students/parents only purchase school items in August and purchase dresses later during the day or during the day. . They want to achieve what their friends are wearing. Sellers also said that younger customers tend to buy dresses because they are essential and need them. Schoolchildren may seem unable to remember that the purpose of school is education, not style statement. By introducing a uniform policy, the economic burden faced by parents could be exhausted or even eliminated. Parents could spend less money each year on clothing costs because they would only need to purchase a few uniforms for the year instead of trying to keep up with changing fashions. “A recent census of IMRA customers found that 52 percent of those measured preferred government suggestions requiring uniforms for schoolchildren because parents want to save money.” Uniforms could be carried over from year to year, so returning students could give or sell their uniforms to new incoming students. Again, this supports the budget since one would not have to buy new clothes every year. For individuals and/or school children who still cannot afford the uniforms, either the school district itself or native professional owners would donate money in order to provide these families with the recommended uniforms or mandatory.Increase in academic achievementInformation collected from across the country, concludes that overall student performance is decreasing in schools. Uniform test scores are declining, as are theory scores across the board. By having a school uniform policy, the focus could be placed on learning that could advance students' academic performance. “Students who join schools with a uniform policy appear more regularly and, when in school, focus on their learning rather than their societal preparations. As a result, their academic performance also increases. Focusing more on academics and that education is more important than how you dress is the message that schools are trying to get across and school districts are trying to communicate that message to their young people. Increase students' self-esteem. Students may develop a low emotional state towards themselves and are often assumed by their upperclassmen when they wear second-hand clothes or believe they do not have clothes tofashion. This attitude is very hard on self-respect and can have a huge influence on how one contributes to culture as an adult. “Uniforms eliminate this bias” because students are not able to distinguish the “haves” from the “have-nots.” New York City institutes are considering the need for uniforms for primary school children for the sole reason of developing self-esteem. "The school's principal, Rudy Crew, believes that if students in kindergarten through third grade wore uniforms, their self-esteem would be based on their academic performance rather than a wardrobe." This school system believes that without a high self-image, students would tend to spend less time in school and, therefore, their learning could be distressing. Disadvantages of Uniform The perception of enforcing a school uniform policy appears to serve satisfactory purposes: advocating for students and providing a valued education, but not all societies believe this. Many people in society, including schoolchildren, parents, teachers and school administrators, have divergent ideas about a school uniform policy. The following information will examine the reasons why some disagree with such a hopeful policy. Violation of First Amendment Rights Freedom Expression through appearance is a legal right, although many school officials attempt to circumvent this right by claiming that a school uniform policy is about policing students for fitness and safety, not compliance. Some adults are upset because students are not able to show their personality through their uniforms and believe this diminishes the students' uniqueness. The court confirmed that schoolchildren's choice of clothing as a means of individual appearance can be controlled by the school. administrators even as they extended First Amendment defenses of political speech to nonverbal acts of communication. It is unclear, however, whether the guarantees of confidentiality and freedom of expression apply to students' choice of clothing. Does not deter violence and gang activity. Those who compete with school uniforms believe that they will not deter violence or mob activity because these actions are not a consequence of the school atmosphere.” Many students who contribute to violent activities and gangs come from an unhealthy environment containing aspects such as substance abuse/physical abuse, maternal impact, lack of family values ​​and cultural traditions; these factors encourage students to participate in such acts of violence. If a uniform policy were implemented, crowds would use other ways to distinguish themselves from each other, such as permanent markings such as tattoos and scars. A one-size-fits-all curriculum "attempts to 'fix kids' and ignores the accumulating evidence in the field of social psychology that demonstrates that how we act and who we are mimics the conditions in which we discover ourselves." Intense activity in schools is such a burden that the school should then work more closely with law enforcement to ensure a safe environment. Schools alone cannot deal with the social issues at stake and exclude crowds and ferocity, simply by enforcing a school dress code. If these issues are not addressed appropriately, violence and gang activity will continue. Schools must rely on outside help, such as, 77(5), 200-204.