Abortion can be defined as deliberately causing the death of a fetus, either by directly killing it or by causing its expulsion from the uterus before it is “viable”. With "the killing of an innocent human being without their consent is murder" and "abortion is the killing of an innocent human being without their consent" are the premises of an argument with a conclusion of "abortion is murder.” Let's break down the first premise. This premise is correct in saying that it is not right to murder someone without their consent. But we must refute the expression being human. When discussing the issue of abortion, many distinguish between the terms human being and people. The human being, in the moral sense, is a “full member of the moral community” (198). We cannot say that a fetus is a human being because it is not a full member of the moral community. It is living inside a woman, of whom she has minimal rights, but who has the right to life. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The second premise reinforces the first by saying that abortion is the killing of a human being without their consent. Of course, you can say that because a fetus can't consent and say, "kill me because I won't have a chance of surviving." This is a very delicate subject because it brings back the question of what a human being is. A moral community to which a human being belongs is a community that has rights and privileges. Does the fetus have the common sense to make a judgment about its suicide? I don't think that's the case, so the conclusion is false that abortion is murder. If murder is killing an innocent human being, then abortion is not murder. This is not murder because there is a distinction between human being and person. The doctor does not murder a human being because he is not part of a full moral community. The fetus is inside, without common sense community or personality. You cannot say that a fetus is a human being using Mary Anne Warrens explanation of a human being that I have already described. A fetus is not part of a community at all. It's inside the womb, within a woman, that she really can't make choices for herself. He will have to conform to what the mother does because he does not yet have a mental or emotional status. The mental and emotional state is the ability to plan, know and be aware. How can we say that a fetus is equal to a human being in this case? When you were born and even two years later, do you have the capacity to do all this? The answer is no because you really don't know what's going on. Abortion cannot be murder in this case because it is impossible to obtain consent from the fetus. It's literally impossible to get consent from someone who wasn't even born and doesn't know what's going on. You can also take this argument further by introducing the fact that the mother could die if she prolongs the pregnancy. Would you say that abortion is murder in this case. If the mother must die when the child is born, why would it be morally wrong to kill a fetus that cannot be considered “human.” The mother is human according to common sense and also according to the definition of a human being. Why would killing a fetus, which is not “human”, be murder when a mother, a “human being” could die because of the birth of the fetus? We could say that the fetus has a beautiful and prosperous life ahead of it, but at what.