Ethics is what defines a person's character. How a person should behave in society. But how can we justify our actions as ethical? One idea suggests that an act is ethical if it benefits the greatest number of people. In doing so, we simply benefit the population as a whole rather than causing any harm. This is why laws set by the government or sacred dialects are considered ethical and constitute a code of conduct that must be followed by every individual. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay In business, utilitarianism applies to decision-making. If the decision benefits the entire company, then it is chosen and put into practice immediately. In the case of criminal justice, we use this approach to test and set the punishment of criminals based on their actions and the magnitude of the impact of that act on society. All these normative ethics are tested according to the utilitarian approach. It seems very simple to claim that an act is ethical and is widely used in today's practical world. Utilitarian ethics can be applied to almost anything and can shine when dealing with complex situations with multiple competing factors. However, its deployment is sometimes tedious and tedious, and its results can be counterintuitive. Let's think about what happens to the minority group? Did anyone notice that their rights were being violated? When viewed in this light, this approach is unethical for all minority groups. As humans, we have no control over anyone else's life. If this business decision leads to the closure of other small businesses. Perhaps this criminal decision does not suit everyone. We've all heard about the Nazi hypothermia experiment. A small group of people were selected and tested with a drug. Scientists involved in the case claimed that the drug would be used for medicinal purposes and to find a cure for serious illnesses. But the experiment failed and 300 people suffered. They were suffering, tortured and devastated. Many of them died in the process. Was it ethical to do so? Why did these 300 people have to suffer? No response was reported by the scientist.Keep in mind: this is just a sample.Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a custom essayAnother example, the most famous game of the blue whale. This game had many levels and to pass any level you need to complete the required task. Tasks included cutting your wrist, jumping off a cliff, hanging yourself from a fan, and more. These are the acts widely practiced by people suffering from depression and low self-esteem. The creator of the game claimed that it was about eradicating from society everyone who does not benefit society. A good approach? According to utilitarianism, this would be ethical, but it is quite the opposite. To conclude, utilitarianism should not be the only approach used to claim something ethical, we must examine from all angles, see if our actions do not infringe on someone else's rights. Then our actions would be ethical and moral.