Over the past five to ten years, a controversial question has circulated: Should students who play sports be paid as a reward for being a college athlete? The answer is no. Student-athletes should not be paid because they already get money in scholarships, they are in school to get a degree and not to play sports, and this would totally go to the defeats the purpose of going to school. College athletes should not be paid because it would ruin the amateurism of college sports and result in young athletes being spoiled with money. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original EssayFor people who want students to get paid, I understand your reasons behind that. Everyone wants to get paid, but that's just not how the world works. Over the past decade, college sports has become a multi-billion dollar business, and many people think that everyone in the industry gets paid except for the college athletes who make the product on the field. However, this is not true at all, most college athletes receive full scholarships to the university they attend, meaning they essentially go to school for free. Additionally, college athletes are still students and should be treated the same as all other students. If they receive compensation for the sport they play, it will make them more important than other students on campus, which is never the goal. Paying students would throw everything out of balance and ultimately hurt universities across the country. On the other hand, one of the reasons why college athletes should not be paid is that it would eliminate the line between amateur and professional sports. According to the NCAA, college athletes are currently not paid because it is still an amateur sport and if amateurs receive compensation, it would eliminate the separation between the two leagues. This could also cause difficulties for athletes who do not enter the professional league, as they would have fewer opportunities available to them. To compound the problem, paying college athletes would affect the audiences and crowds the sport attracts. Many people love college sports because the athletes play for the love of the game, not the money. And what some people don't understand is that college athletes already get paid in the form of scholarships or athletic scholarships. In the words of the NCAA, "It is important to clarify that while many rules encourage amateurism, rules specifically related to scholarships remain fundamentally an economic relationship of providing labor in exchange for compensation." It is therefore legally correct to consider the receipt of a scholarship by the student-athlete as compensation.” If you are a college athlete and have earned a scholarship, the university you are attending is already rewarding you for your talents. There is no reason for you to get paid for a sport if you are in it to improve your education and get a degree. If college athletes were paid, it would ruin the culture of college sports. Students love school sports because the athletes are still students. They are seen in class and on campus and still lead normal lives. Introducing money into the world of athletes would make them seem more important than everyone else.school and this is not the case. College athletes put in more time and have a heavier workload than some students, but they are rewarded by receiving a scholarship and most likely going to school for free. College sports are supposed to be fun and all about the game, not the money. If an athlete is paid, they will never understand the true meaning of working for something and they will not understand the purpose of college sports. If college athletes were paid, teams would become unfair because "you're going to think bigger. Schools are using (paying athletes) as a recruiting advantage" and therefore ruining the culture of college sports. It is very difficult to secure a position on a college team, much less receive a full scholarship. Only about 7% of high school athletes advance to the college level, and only 2% of those athletes reach the division one level. This helps show how special it is to be a part of college sports and how rare it is to not have to pay for college. Paying college athletes would put a damper on things and negatively affect many universities. To strengthen my argument, university students should not be paid because they receive a free education at a high-quality university, while in other cases some students might not be able to afford it. And to top it off, they will get a diploma. In other words, these players are already paid thanks to the scholarship they receive, allocated according to the player's talent and determined by the training coach. In an interview with a reporter, they said: "These are students who gain access to a college education through their participation in sports, for which they earn scholarships to pay for tuition, fees, accommodation and food, as well as other eligible expenses. College sports are not a career or profession. It’s the way for students to access a higher education degree” (Mitchell). On average, most universities charge between 30,000 and 50,000 per year, with fully covered scholarships and less stress for families and students. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized document from our expert now. writers.Get a Custom EssayA student-athlete's first priority is their education, and then sports; unlike professionals where they only focus on the sport they play. The fact that students have more on their plate makes them more passionate about the sport because they play for the love of the sport and not for the money. If the student-athlete received compensation, his innocence would be taken away and he would no longer play for the same reasons. Like everything in business, money has to come from somewhere. So if athletes were paid, funds for academics would decrease and universities would lose money. Ultimately, school athletic departments would become more of a business rather than a department designed to help athletes improve their skills on the field and in the classroom. Scholarships are meant to be a way to provide education to students who cannot afford to attend college. If student-athletes could be paid, that's what a scholarship would provide. Simone Jacobs was a rower at Stanford University and in an interview said, "I get paid as much as I'm on scholarship." I get paid to the extent that I don't have to pay as much for college. If student-athletes were paid more.