In Canada, a number of laws and policies are in place to ensure the safety of all Canadians, particularly those who are the most vulnerable in our country. society: children. In our society, if a crime is noticed, we can call it or report it to the police. We take for granted the feeling of being protected and safe when we walk on the streets because we know that law enforcement and the community are watching and can intervene if necessary. At the touch of a few buttons, help can arrive at our home within minutes. However, not everything is visible in the public sphere, as many things go unnoticed and happen behind closed doors, and often at home. The use of corporal punishment has been associated with negative developmental outcomes in children, but it is still legal to use corporal punishment on a child. This essay will discuss the effects of corporal punishment, why parents use corporal punishment on their children, and whether this style of parenting should be used. A decision by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2004 ruled that there were limits to the use of corporal punishment. It cannot be used on children under 2 years old and over 12 years old, nor on a disabled child of any age. He also stated that it could not be degrading, inhumane or harmful, and that it could not include the use of any type of object like belts or rulers. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get the original essayResearch has shown that exposure to domestic violence has long-term effects, with detrimental effects on intrapersonal thoughts , emotional health, social skills, learning and physical health. The argument being that if research shows that domestic violence has long-term effects, we should not be allowed to use corporal punishment on children. Corporal punishment can be defined as the use of physical force with the aim of making a child feel pain, but not injury, for the purpose of correction or control of behavior. Some parents use it as a parenting style on their children; when, for example, children do not behave or do what they are told, some parents will resort to corporal punishment when they see fit. When a parent uses corporal punishment on their own child, it can interfere with the relationship and the development of trust that forms between the parent and child. This will make the child less likely to comply. If the child always lives in fear of punishment, then his attention is focused on the consequences for himself rather than the consequences of his behavior. If the child only obeys when controlled through physical punishment, once the punisher is absent, the child's internal motivation to comply is weakened. Spanking is the most commonly used corporal punishment against children. The younger the child, the more likely he or she will be subjected to corporal punishment. If the parenting style is changed from punitive to non-punitive, research shows that the child's aggressive behavior is as low as that of those who use only a non-punitive style. It does not appear to be used effectively by parents once their child turns 9 years old. It is difficult to know exactly how hard the child is being slapped, because some adults spank more than others. In a traditional family home, the mother is more likely to use punishmentbodily than the father. Parents' previous experience with corporal punishment will affect the way they educate their child. Research has shown that parents hit as children are more likely to hit their own children. Cultural and subcultural norms may influence the use of corporal punishment, in addition to parental history of corporal punishment. When parents use corporal punishment, they may not realize how much they are spanking their child. For example, abusive parents spank their children more often than non-abusive parents and excessive spanking may be a risk factor for child maltreatment. Therefore, the use of spanking may increase the potential use of severe and frequent corporal punishment. ​In the past, corporal punishment was used by parents, as well as teachers, for religious reasons. If you were left-handed at school, teachers would spank you with objects such as rulers, so that you wouldn't use your left hand to write; the reason being that the left hand is associated with the devil's side. Many people were forced to change their dominant writing hand from left to right simply because of their religious views, and suffered corporal punishment for this. My grandmother is one of those people who unfortunately cannot write very legibly today because she is right-handed because she was forced to go to school. It is believed that this form of childhood punishment would eliminate the child's sins. The child must benefit from the discipline used. Which goes into more detail to explain that a child's age and disability can affect their ability to learn from the use of force. That force must be “reasonable in the circumstances” and “not offend society’s conceptions of decency.” The term "reasonable force" depends on one's personal interpretation, which can also lead to misinterpretation. Sometimes the law must step in and remove children from their parents if the treatment and punishments meted out to them are too harsh. On the other hand, some parents choose to use corporal punishment because it is considered an effective tool to correct bad behavior, reinforce respect and obedience, protect the child from harm, teach the child lessons of life and prepare him for the challenges of life. In the past, it was thought that if corporal punishment was used, then you were considered a good parent, and it could even be seen as a sign of caring. On the other side of the argument, we have those who are strong advocates against the use of corporal punishment altogether, as they perceive it to be immoral. We have laws in place to protect adults and even pets, but children can be. This puts the child in danger and can even be potentially abusive and distressing. This violates our Canadian Charter of Freedoms and Rights and is considered an ineffective way to correct “bad behavior.” Those who oppose the use of corporal punishment point out that it is a violation of human rights and goes against the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Children are the most vulnerable, and it is parents who ensure their safety, but it calls into question the safety of the child when they are physically punished at the discretion of their parents. We do not allow adults to be physically harmed by others, but we do allow them to harm those who are vulnerable. During childhood development, children learn byobserving and imitating. If they see their parents hitting or slapping them while they are angry with the child, the child might imitate this behavior when he gets angry, and this is what he sees happening at the result of his anger. Some children may begin to use some of the corporal punishment they receive toward other classmates at school, such as when arguing with another child about playing with a toy. The child who grows up in a punitive environment would be more likely to engage in aggressive or physical behavior than the child who is not punitive. We cannot legally correct the bad behavior of anyone over the age of 12 in our society with physical force, and some argue that the same should be true for children. Some people see corporal punishment as a way for parents to molest their children, a right granted to adults by the government and section 43 of the Criminal Code. In general, we should protect the most vulnerable, those who need protection and have rights, like any other Canadian or person in the world. Parents use corporal punishment for many reasons. They may have been raised with corporal punishment themselves, they don't know of other parenting styles to use as an alternative, or simply because nothing else seems to work. Many problems can arise and even become worse when spanking a child. This models aggression, and children are more likely to do what their parents do rather than do what their parents say. This can make the child feel ashamed because they see themselves as “bad” and can develop self-esteem issues. A child who is ashamed will not learn and will not be motivated to improve their behavior. This is not a parenting style that you can follow once the child reaches a certain age. Therefore, children will outgrow corporal punishment as they grow up and parents should find another way to punish their child, by taking away an electronic device for a day. be more effective than spanking the child. Too often, parents use physical punishment to resolve their behavior problems, which could end up making them even worse. Parents should explore all types of discipline styles, but most do not seek alternatives. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay To conclude, corporal punishment has been a parenting style for a long time and used across generations. It would be very difficult to eliminate all corporal punishment in homes, as it is rarely observed and is permitted under article 43 of the Penal Code. Parents will educate their children in whatever way they deem acceptable, but more education is needed about the effects of corporal punishment and other methods of punishment they may impose. There is no one right way to raise a child, and every parent has the right to choose how to discipline their child. Through more comprehensive education about corporal punishment, we can change the way society perceives it. Overall, corporal punishment can be used effectively, but the frequency, severity, and reason are not always appropriate. One child in a household can correct their behavior after experiencing corporal punishment, while the other sibling in the household cannot, with the removal of an electronic device potentially being their form of corrective punishment. Corporal punishment should not, 108(3), 542-560.