Gun Ownership for the Mentally Ill of violence and necessity on the table for a brief period before being forgotten. One of the issues that has once again been brought to the forefront is whether people with mental illness should be allowed to purchase guns. One of the biggest debates over this issue is whether people with mental instability have the same rights as all Americans, the right to keep and bear arms; Supporters of recent reductions in gun restrictions for the mentally ill adamantly cite this problem. Opponents of gun ownership by people with mental illness cite violent tendencies and lack of remorse for human life, as seen in psychopaths and other illnesses. This article intends to argue that although limiting gun ownership by the mentally ill may be beneficial in reducing instances of violent crime, it would be difficult to enforce and in violation of several laws. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayOne of the biggest criticisms the Trump administration has faced since the deadly shootings in Las Vegas, Nevada, was the early 2017 implementation of HJ Res. 40 which struck down the implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (United States. Congress). Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 required the Social Security Administration and other federal agencies to provide records of individuals with mental disabilities to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System or NICS for short (United States. Social Security). NICS allows firearm sellers and the FBI to quickly identify whether the customer has a criminal record or other illegitimacy that restricts his or her ability to purchase a firearm (“National”). Since its implementation in November 1998, more than 230 million checks have been carried out, which led to 1.3 million purchase refusals (“National”). The clear majority of Americans are in favor of background checks on all gun buyers, with the results of several polls showing that this average is around 90% (Kertscher). The restrictions that are part of NICS provide a precise and foolproof way to control people and save lives, allowing relatively educated and responsible Americans to purchase firearms while keeping them away from those who, according to people, could seek to do harm. The central question in the mental illness gun debate is whether people with mental illness have the same rights as other Americans. Many reforms have been proposed since the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting, including mental health background checks for all gun sales [including the gun show loophole], update of the National Mental Health Background Check System and an increase in reported patient mental health problems (Kangas and Calvert). From the beginning, the goal of background checks was to identify people who were involuntarily engaged in psychiatric treatment or who were identified by the courts as mentally incompetent, but the state of Florida went further and adopted a gun control law that required.

Essay / Gun Ownership for the Mentally Ill of violence and necessity on the table for a brief period before being forgotten. One of the issues that has once again been brought to the forefront is whether people with mental illness should be allowed to purchase guns. One of the biggest debates over this issue is whether people with mental instability have the same rights as all Americans, the right to keep and bear arms; Supporters of recent reductions in gun restrictions for the mentally ill adamantly cite this problem. Opponents of gun ownership by people with mental illness cite violent tendencies and lack of remorse for human life, as seen in psychopaths and other illnesses. This article intends to argue that although limiting gun ownership by the mentally ill may be beneficial in reducing instances of violent crime, it would be difficult to enforce and in violation of several laws. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayOne of the biggest criticisms the Trump administration has faced since the deadly shootings in Las Vegas, Nevada, was the early 2017 implementation of HJ Res. 40 which struck down the implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 (United States. Congress). Implementation of the NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007 required the Social Security Administration and other federal agencies to provide records of individuals with mental disabilities to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System or NICS for short (United States. Social Security). NICS allows firearm sellers and the FBI to quickly identify whether the customer has a criminal record or other illegitimacy that restricts his or her ability to purchase a firearm (“National”). Since its implementation in November 1998, more than 230 million checks have been carried out, which led to 1.3 million purchase refusals (“National”). The clear majority of Americans are in favor of background checks on all gun buyers, with the results of several polls showing that this average is around 90% (Kertscher). The restrictions that are part of NICS provide a precise and foolproof way to control people and save lives, allowing relatively educated and responsible Americans to purchase firearms while keeping them away from those who, according to people, could seek to do harm. The central question in the mental illness gun debate is whether people with mental illness have the same rights as other Americans. Many reforms have been proposed since the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting, including mental health background checks for all gun sales [including the gun show loophole], update of the National Mental Health Background Check System and an increase in reported patient mental health problems (Kangas and Calvert). From the beginning, the goal of background checks was to identify people who were involuntarily engaged in psychiatric treatment or who were identified by the courts as mentally incompetent, but the state of Florida went further and adopted a gun control law that required.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch