Macbeth or Lyndon B. Johnson The king was a beloved leader who was unreasonably killed by someone he believed to be loyal to him. The accused of the murder is innocent and those who were responsible for his safety failed to keep their promise. The leader's successor will take his place shortly after and the citizens will not suspect the culprit. The successor felt that he had achieved what was rightfully his. You might think this sounds like the plot of a fictional story, but that's because it's derived from Shakespeare's Macbeth. What might surprise you is that the 17th century tragedy was emulated by one of the most controversial events in American history, the assassination of John F. Kennedy, the 35th President of the United States -United. President Kennedy's North American tour in Dallas on November 22, 1963, was interrupted when a sniper, Lee Harvey Oswald, shot him from the sixth floor of the infamous Book Depository building. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay The FBI believed it was an individual plot targeting Oswald. Many theories have surrounded this assassination. The most famous theory has always been that which linked Lyndon B. Johnson to the tragic event. The plot would be riddled with deception and torment, just like the story of Macbeth. Although the characters in the stories have different names, the motive and outcome are eerily similar. Once a conspiracy theory in history, current events reveal that the JFK tragedy at the hands of Lyndon B. Johnson may no longer be a theory. These circumstances suggest that the events occurring in Shakespeare's tragedy Macbeth are still possible. It is possible that the plot of the well-known tragedy will be repeated in modern America of the 20th century. That being said, no protection provides absolute and total security, many men are still willing to commit the crimes Macbeth got what they wanted, and the deed could always be covered up by a simple and credible alibi and a culprit. In today's world, it is easier than ever to plan and execute a murder. Anyone can buy a cheap gun, pull the trigger and kill someone. It's also much easier to kill a person without getting caught. There are long-range guns and remote-controlled explosives that can be used as a murder weapon while the one behind it is far from the scene. Plus, it's easier than ever to find a professional assassin who can kill anyone for a very large amount of money. These latter methods could allow a person to commit murder and get away with it. Even if the real murderer can be caught, the person financing the business could very well escape unscathed. In Macbeth, Duncan was extremely well protected by his guards, but he was still brutally murdered. The guards were subdued by a very simple trick. “The doors are open, and the satisfied grooms mock their charge with snores. I have drugged their possessions…” Lady Macbeth declares. She had seduced the men and drugged their drinks, instead of guarding Duncan, they were sleeping. Macbeth was easily able to sneak past them, undetected, and kill Duncan. Every precaution imaginable had been taken to ensure the protection of the beloved King Duncan. It's not easy to get around two armed bodyguards in an exceptionally restricted area. However, through double-dealing, Macbeth managed to achieve this, which awakens the assertion that no protection is.