The death penalty means the condemnation of the condemned to execution as carried out by the state and the judicial system . Keep in mind that the definition of the death penalty is much deeper than that. The death penalty argument is a subject that may not see its conclusion any time soon. It is considered controversial because what is at stake is the life of an individual, their values, their morals and their dignity. Whether he will still achieve morality and dignity is up to the beholder, but must be considered nonetheless. The ideals of utilitarianism and retributivism are considered when examining the death penalty and whether it is morally right or immoral and ethical. Punishment and the key words stated above are equally important, if not the most important word, when it comes to the death penalty. We will examine Kant's ethics and the values ​​he places on individuals as well as Kant's theory of punishment and the death penalty. Kant published Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals in 1793, which focuses heavily on the philosophy of morality. Alongside Kant, we will examine Bedau and Marshal's suggestion that Kant's two ideals are at odds with each other. These two are his ethical idea in relation to his theory of punishment. Marshall's use of the 8th Amendment as it relates to the death penalty being legal or ethical is also well played. Amidst these oppositions, Pojman's Kantian argument will also be mentioned, in which he describes what some consider to be a huge exception to the death penalty or harsh punishments in general. According to Marshall, as humans, we all have values ​​and rights. After all, we are humans and not animals. The term intrinsic value must be highlighted in any text concerning the death penalty. The question of death before me is the length of a trial to convict the murderer. Although according to Kant the form of rehabilitation is not to be used, I believe it should be, but to a certain extent. If found guilty, the murderer will be sentenced to a very long period of incarceration. The time spent trying to decide whether or not to capitalize on his case, if any, places the accused in solitary confinement, which only allows for psychological damage. As a specialist in forensic psychology, I understand the effects that solitary confinement can have on an individual. The brain is what holds us together to stay sane. Psychologically, brain impairment is the highest, if not the highest, form of damage. This is a completely different degree of isolating a person from society than isolating a person from humanity. The person is stripped of their autonomy, intrinsic value and dignity.