Why do people watch documentaries? Probably to get information visually. Documentaries need to be both informative and interesting to watch. Two interesting and informative documentaries Bowling for Columbine and Koyaanisqatsi. Yet they are very different when it comes to getting messages across. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Bowling for Columbine reveals hidden problems in states. In the film he is shown getting bullets at a market, a gun at a bank, and an interview with the NRA. What Moore does well is that it's not objective. This doesn't seem far away, because it gets to the heart of the problem. He boldly asks sensitive questions and records truly honest answers. For example, asking why don't you lock the door and focusing on their facial expression while listening to their answers. Another good example would be when Moore asks Heston if he is willing to apologize and visit Heston while he is gone. This shows how Heston deals with difficulties and indirectly shows that Moore is right. Additionally, after asking Heston to take a look at the girl's photo and asking her not to leave, he takes a long shot and zooms in to bring a clear view of Heston's back, endorsing Heston's point of view. Moore second hand. This not only helps to endorse his opinion, but also makes an excellent social documentary. Interviewing real people without a script and showing their feelings such as embarrassment makes the documentary more authentic. Additionally, their feelings are expressed more sincerely. Moore shows societal issues such as fear and truth by showing the poverty zone and the Columbine school. He applies contrasting juxtapositions to convey this idea. It shows the government that it doesn't even care about the gap between rich and poor. Contrasting messages from the news. Fear of African Americans and white supremacists. This fear leads white people to buy more guns and believe they are doing it to protect themselves. However, showing the difference in views between the United States and Canada when it comes to guns only confirms Moore's message. Then the rock version of a song “What a wonderful world” comes out, showing a deeper paradox and making the truth more repulsive. On the other hand, Koyaanisqatsi flows differently from Bowling for Columbine. Without any prologue, it continues to play videos and music. It was very extraordinary and revolutionary. Four parts with different themes and approximately 90 minutes of duration. The most impressive sequence is where the city, life and people of the 80s are filmed at fast film speed, like rapid movement. This allows the director's message to be conveyed: unbalanced city life and excess population. And the sound of the film is magnificent and reinforces its experimental function. A relatively calm beginning then expands and speeds up the music, making the film more exposition, bringing the audience to the climax through the music, developing an adrenaline-pumping arrangement. On the other hand, Koyaanisqatsi is a film more hostile to the public because the film is more abstract. The film has no dialogue, the appreciation of the film depends entirely on the audience's thoughts and view to interpret and analyze. The film begins with an ancient mural and elegant, primitive music. Then the scene disappears and the rocket launch scene appears. It is structured by assembly plans. I personally interpret Koyaanisqatsi's message,.