The code of ethics serves as a moral compass that directs and guides the integrity, values ​​and beliefs of an organization. A code of ethics clarifies to employees what the company stands for and its expectations for conduct (Daft, 2013). A well-written code represents a true commitment to responsible business practices as it outlines specific procedures for handling ethical failures. Within the research enterprise, the code of ethics ensures that research projects involving human subjects are conducted without harm to the subjects involved. Research ethics also ensures that researchers conduct their research ethically. This article will focus on the regulations and guidelines that govern ethics in research, a study in which research ethics were violated, and recommendations to improve ethics within the company research. The research enterprise is comprised of research organizations (i.e., academic health centers, federal government). , researchers, human volunteers, and stakeholders (i.e., health insurers, health care systems, and consumers. To understand the nuances of the research enterprise, one must know the meaning research means systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge (45 Code of Federal Communities 46.102(d)). This is the foundation of the research enterprise, to produce knowledge useful for understanding human disease, preventing and treating disease, and promoting health can be used to develop innovative new concepts that can lead to scientific breakthroughs. creation of new knowledge, to the formation of new health and research policies, to the development of new pr...... middle of paper ..... .action (Elliston, 1985). public health. While working there, he discovered that poor black syphilis patients were being denied proper medical treatment so that they could conduct experimental medical treatments on these patients. In 1972, Peter Buxtun left the Public Health Services to denounce this violation of human subjects. He made the decision to report this mistreatment of human subjects to the Associated Press, which then published the story. Even though whistleblowers are considered “snitches,” Peter Buxtun decided that reporting this violation was the only way to right the horrible wrong of mistreating and harming human subjects. “For 40 years, the United States Public Health Service has conducted a study in which human guinea pigs, having not received proper treatment, died from syphilis and its side effects” (Perkiss, 2013).