Everyone has their own means of transportation that they use to get to work, school, grocery stores, etc. Transportation is a vehicle or system of vehicles, such as buses, trains, etc. (Cambridge Dictionary English) allowing you to get from one place to another, but there are two types of transport: public and private. Public transport is a system of buses, trains, etc., operating on fixed routes, on which the public can travel (Cambridge Dictionary English), while private transport, as opposed to public transport, is a transport service which is not available for use by the general public. (Definition.net) Either of these systems can be founded in any city, but they have key differences that impact people's decision on whether to use transportation public or private. The view of public transportation is changing as it grows in popularity thanks to ride-hailing apps like Uber. Additionally, this has been one of the reasons why we have helped the environment by reducing greenhouse gas emissions released into the atmosphere. However, the automotive industry is an important source of income for the economy and allows people to forgo the comfort of their own personal car to take public transport, for the good of the planet. These contrasting arguments led me to formulate my question: should public transport replace private transport? Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The first perspective begins by explaining that private transportation has several negative impacts on India. The article is titled “Development of Urban Public Transport in India” by Jaspal Singh, revealing the ill effects of private transport on India and their plans to develop more public transport systems to improve them. Jaspal Singh is known as an expert in urban transportation with his over 10 years of experience in the field of urban transportation and management consulting. He is currently the head of the UITP India office and has been working there since 2003. Although before working with UITP he established a consultancy firm called Valoriser Consultants, the firm interacted with companies specializing in bus transport, paratransit, transport planning. and intelligent transportation system. He has also been recognized several times for his contributions in the field of public transportation and social work. (Biographical Trainer)The adverse impacts that private vehicles like personal cars have created in India, such as severe traffic congestion, forcing travel on the streets to take longer and higher per capita journeys. Another section of the article dealing with road accidents recorded a total of approximately 501,423 road accidents and 146,133 road accident deaths in 2015; which brings the average to 1,374 accidents and 400 deaths every day because of these private vehicles. The next section mentions air pollution, which has great importance in developing countries like India, where around 1.4 million people have died due to air pollution; which caused approximately $505 billion in welfare losses; and $55.4 billion for labor losses. Their plans to solve this problem include creating smart cities, revamping bus and subway systems, in which they will invest in more technological advancements and use government funding tobring these projects to life. In this way, they could reduce the extent of the negative impacts that private transport causes on their country. (Intelligent Transport, 2016) Now moving from Asia to Europe, Germany is facing similar air pollution problems affecting the country. A Global Citizen article titled "Germany plans free public transport to combat air pollution" mentions the terrible state of air quality in Germany, to the point that the European Union had threatened the country with a colossal amount of fines.if Germany did not take any action to change this potentially deadly situation, as there were fears that it could impact the health of many German citizens. The author, Joe McCarthy, is an editor at Global Citizen. He studied creative writing at Southern Connecticut State University and currently writes numerous articles on environmental issues and world events. (Global Citizen)He explains in the article that although Germany already contained other cheap public transport options compared to the rest of the European Union, according to the Guardian, but the planning proposal would be traveling by train, one of their well-known sources of public transportation; be free. The plan is expected to be implemented in five cities in the west of the country, including Bonn, Mannheim and Essen. Although the proposal has not been described in detail, it is suggested that it will affect subways and other short-distance trains, making people more dependent on these transportation sources than their own personal vehicles in order to reduce emissions green gases. (Joe McCarthy, 2018) Furthermore, another CNN article, titled “Luxembourg makes all public transport free”, supports this point and has the same plans as Germany, with the hope that all public transport will be free. The reason for this plan was all the road congestion that the country had accumulated and the government had hoped that free public transport would change this situation. Andrea Lo, the author of this article, graduated from Oxford Brookes University, works as a journalist and has approximately 8 years of experience in English-language print and digital media. In the article it is stated that the average driver spends around 33 hours in traffic jams that are even worse than other cities in Europe like Copenhagen and Helsinki, where the cities have a population similar to that of Luxembourg as a whole, but the divers had only spent an average of 24 hours there. Thus, eliminating the number of drivers on the street by allowing people with a better alternative option to get rid of the enormous amount of congestion that the country contains. (Lo Andrea, 2020) However, we forget how necessary private transport is, to what extent it helps a country's economy, but also how it creates jobs. The article titled “Thai Automotive Industry: Opportunities and Incentives” from ASEAN Briefing shows the importance that the automotive industry has for its country. Author Vasundhara Rastogi writes editorial and research operations such as magazines, websites, tax guides and client reports for ASEAN. She is known for her writing on economic, legal and regulatory issues in the interests of foreign investors and multinational corporations. She also holds an MSc in Development Economics from the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London, and a BA in Economics from the University of Delhi. (Asia Briefing) She reveals in the article that Thailand is the 13th largest exporter of auto parts and the sixth largest manufacturer ofcommercial vehicles in the world. Its automotive industry accounts for about 12 percent of Thailand's economic growth and employs more than 500,000 people in the sector. If our personal vehicles were taken away, the country would lose one of its main channels of economic growth and many people would become unemployed. The Thai economy could then lose a large part of its revenue and the government would be forced to pay for the loss of these people's jobs. (Vasundhara Rastogi, 2018) Continuing the issue, an article titled “The Automotive Industry in Brazil – Statistics and Facts” from Statista also highlights the importance of the automotive industry for its country. The author of the article is Marina Pasquali, Latin America team lead at Statista, infographics editor and senior data researcher. (Linkin) She states in the article that the Brazilian automobile industry had a turnover of approximately $60 billion in 2017. In 2018, the production of cars and other personal vehicles by the automobile industry has produced more than five million vehicles, which has created more jobs for Brazilian citizens. The automobile industry employs around 130,000 people. If we replaced all cars with public transport, these people would lose their jobs, which proves once again the essential nature of private transport. (Marina Pasquali, 2019) Although another article describes that private transportation not only has an impact on the country's economy and people's financial stability, but it is due to their habits and comfort to have their own personal transportation, especially those who live in the US. The article is titled “The Benefits of Having a Car” by ITSTILLRUNS. The author is Pallab Dutta, he has published around 600 articles on several different sites like ITSTILLRUNS, The Times of India, The Wall Street Journal, The Economic Times, India Abroad and Gulf News. (Pallab Dutta Blogs) He says cars are more flexible for people as those who travel across states for business do not need to use their money for travel. Another section of the article discusses how people love the car as their own sign of independence, because with public transportation you're forced to rely on their schedule to get you wherever you're going . Public transportation is not very common in the states, forcing people to use a car. The next section discusses medical emergencies and how rural areas that don't have many ambulances and police cars are forced to use cars in case of serious injuries because public transportation is filled with people. other people and could make the problem worse or make it too late to intervene. the hospital. (Pallab Dutta)Keep in mind: This is just a sample.Get a custom paper from our expert writers now.Get a custom essayBy finding evidence of the benefits of both sides of each perspective, I have acquired more knowledge than I on either side of these articles. Before doing research, I was aware of the pollution and damage our cars cause to our countries and the planet, but I didn't know the full extent of the problem until reading these articles. Another thing I learned was that private transportation had more benefits than people's comfort and dependence on cars, such as the economic impact on the country and the ability to provide jobs for many people, like in Thailand or Luxembourg. Based on the evidence provided to me, I believe that public transport should not replace private transport, but that people 2019,.