Karl Zender explains that there is obvious realism in Faulkner's story, but the modernist twist throughout is the symbolism of irony which leads the reader away from realism towards a deeper meaning. . Thus, leaving the reader to decide what deeper meaning connects the characters to the plot itself. It's true. The story is full of realism with symbolism that leads me to believe there is a deeper meaning. Zender breaks down literature into a psychological and social function and that William Faulkner's Barn Burning embodies this. The value of the story in the theme is always present and shows the means of loyalty and maturation of the character named Sarty. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Namely, Zender depicts Sarty's climax of Faulkner essentially killing his father as a frame for Sarty's coming of age knowing he must move on. Zender highlights the engagement of three issues that move Sarty forward throughout the story. First, why does Ab take Sarty to Spain's house the first time, Second, why does he take Sarty the second time, and third, why does he refuse to tie Sarty to the bed as his other son suggests, before going to burn. The barn of Spain? But overall, Zender compares these issues to Sarty's felt loyalty and pull of values ​​that contradict with his barn-burning father's defense. Zender shows this feeling by explaining that Sarty feels freedom when he sees De Spain's big house. The blood ties taught to Sarty are more important than anything else and create conflict between him and his father. Zender explains that simply viewing these issues and conflicts as mere developments reduces the significance of the story. Additionally, we usually see the character but not beyond his prediction. The story is not intended for us readers to limit ourselves to things like prediction and character development, but also the values ​​and meaning of a classic text for today's world. Zender explains that the event of taking his son to the great De Spain house was intended to derail his son's thoughts of disloyalty by showing that even the purest things can be tainted. Ab, with the rapid movement of his foot, traces the excrement on the carpet which symbolizes this point. This is a crucial point in understanding the relationship between Ab and Sarty. It's a relationship that is still being reconciled after Sarty's misstep at the beginning of the story with the Court judge. It's a relationship in which Ab takes control while the family rested before arriving at the De Spain house. Ab hit his son and taught him loyalty, as his son had been implicitly taught before. Zender points out that Faulkner often has a parent-child relationship in his stories. Relationships are often personal and complicated. The fact that Ab had multiple instances of symbolism in his son's actions is obvious and Zender explains that this is crucial to the storyline and theme. Following Zender's advice, viewing this story as Sarty's development and maturity, but looking deeper into the symbolism and meaning, provided a better understanding of the message and theme that Faulkner described. Zender shows that the psychological bill of teaching from a teacher-student method, as amplified by Faulkner with Ab and Sarty, is a crucial part of the story and shows the truth of the analysis of Zender according to.