Racial profiling is an ongoing and concerning problem in the United States of America. This is happening daily in cities and states across the country. Police officers tend to use racial profiling, relying solely on an individual's race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin to associate them with the commission of a crime. This practice can be used to determine who to stop for minor traffic violations, also known as "black driving", or which people to search for illegal contraband based on their race without proof that they actually committed or were involved in a crime. activity, as well as the individuals against whom the use of force is administered. Racial profiling is a disturbing and illegal violation of the Constitution of the United States of America, which in the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments promises “equal protection under the law for all” and “freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures.” . Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay A change or reform needs to be implemented. Many suggestions for reform have been made in the literature used to support my position on this issue. Dunn suggested there be traffic stop data collection forms that should be filled out by police officers after every traffic stop, whether a ticket was issued or not. This will involve determining whether there are racial or ethnic disparities in police traffic stop patterns. As well as carrying out a traffic census of the population of drivers who can be arrested or fined in certain geographical areas. This method will highlight potential problems with racist policing in particular areas under surveillance. Warren and Tomaskovic-Devey suggest that the extent of media coverage and legislative activity influence racial profiling of police officers. Therefore, a federal proposal should be presented to illustrate national legislative possibilities. The introduction of a national bill can make police officers realize that they are under surveillance, which will significantly improve their performance rates and reduce police profiling. Federal and state bills can send a message to police on issues of public concern, even if they don't pass. Finally, Alpert, Dunham, and Smith believe that the best way to ensure that agents are fair, legal, and just. To reduce the reality or perception of racial profiling, “police departments must have clear policies and guidelines explaining the proper use of race in decision-making. Additionally, police officers must be trained and made aware of the overall impact of using race as a factor in deciding how to respond to an individual. Third, the department must maintain a data collection and analysis system to monitor the activities of its police officers as they relate to the race of the citizen. The fourth suggestion involves the use of police record checks, which could trigger a process leading to citizen detention and arrest. Finally, the production of an interrogation report for subsequent information has implications for the citizen. The use of this intelligence tool should depend on suspicion of criminal activity rather than the race or ethnicity of the citizen. » I think the best way to reform this problem is amixture of all these excellent suggestions written by previous researchers. To reduce, and eventually end, racial profiling, I believe the first step is to address the problem by welcoming new police officers into the academy. The laws, morals, and expectations of their job must be engraved in their minds. They should be well trained and informed of their moral obligations. Next, I think supervisors should keep every police officer's data from every citizen they arrest. Their trip, the reason for the stop, and it should be reported if a warning or ticket was issued. As well as a camera on each officer's uniform that records each stop to ensure their reliability and so supervisors can monitor the activities of each officer. Many citizens believe that police officers can do whatever they want and get away with it. To ensure that this is not the case, police departments should implement a policy that threatens either suspension or loss of their job if the officer does not live up to expectations. work performance. Finally, I believe the most effective reform regarding racial profiling would be to bring more media attention to the issue and introduce a bill like the one suggested by Warren and Tomaskovic-Devey, something similar to the The passage of Senate Bill 76, but instead of an individual state, introducing it at the national level, which "required the collection and correlation of data on traffic stops conducted by state agents, which includes the race of the driver, whether and on what legal basis the officer conducted a search, whether the search revealed contraband, and whether an arrest resulted. Recent overviews of the literature suggest that there is disproportionality between rates of traffic stops and searches among Caucasians and individuals of color, as well as treatment by an officer after the stop. The stark racial disparities found in stationary traffic violations, such as driving with a suspended license or not wearing a seat belt, among African Americans in the cities of Cleveland and Shaker, violations that are normally detected through electronic surveillance or during a traffic stop. Warren and Tomaskovic-Devey's research proves to reform advocates that it is possible to "look out for" or overtly notice African American drivers. reform racial profiling by effectively and deliberately using the media to draw attention to the problem and working to convince the legislature to act by producing a bill to reduce or even end racial profiling . Warren and Tomaskovic-Devey examined data from a study of traffic stops and searches on North Carolina state highways. “Warren and Tomaskovic-Devey examined the incidence of searches of African-American drivers in relation to the popularity of media coverage of racial profiling and examined this activity in the context of legislative action in North Carolina to attempt to determine whether the passage of anti-profiling legislation influenced police searches of African Americans. The authors then combined the two public reactions to police activity, media coverage, and legislative activity into “the politics” of racial profiling. North Carolina passed a racial profiling law called Senate Bill 76. The law required the correlation and retrieval of data on traffic stops conducted by North Carolina state troopers, which consisted of the race of the stopped driver, if and on what legal basis..